Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TIGER CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TIGER CONSTRUCTION in 4773 HERON LAKES CIRCLE, BRYAN, TX 77802 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 337167795.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tiger Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tiger Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TIGER CONSTRUCTION
Site address
4773 HERON LAKES CIRCLE
City
BRYAN
State
TX
ZIP
77802
Mailing
208 ROBERTS ST., BRYAN, TX 77803
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2013
Abate by
Jan 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns.  On or about November 01, 2012, employees who were working on the ground level around a two story residential home were not wearing hard hats, while two other employees were working above them on the roof, exposing the employee to the hazard of being struck by tools or materials.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees are protected by protective helmets where overhead hazards exist.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.304 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2013
Abate by
Jan 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $650 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.304(d): When the tool was withdrawn from the work, the lower guard did not automatically and instantly return to the covering position:  On or about November 01, 2012, employee was cutting lumber using a Makita circular hand held saw where the lower blade guard had a wood shim wedged into the guard, keeping the guard in the open position and exposing employees to the hazard of coming in contact with the saw blade.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that the lower blade guard will automatically and instantly return to the covering position.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $650
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2013
Abate by
Jan 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person.  On or about November 01, 2012, employees were working from several scaffolds, where the highest scaffold was 24 feet in height and were not designed and built by a competent person, exposing employees to the hazard of falls up to 24 feet.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each scaffold is designed by a qualified person and built in accordance to that design.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2013
Abate by
Jan 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide.  On or about November 01, 2012, employees had been working from the scaffold platforms and walkways which had a single scaffold board measuring 10 inches in width and the walkways were up to approximately 24 feet in height, exposing the employees to the hazard of a 24 foot fall.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that scaffold platforms and walkways are at least 18 inches in width.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2013
Abate by
Jan 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  On or about November 01, 2012, employees were working from several scaffolds which were 9 to 24 feet in height that were not provided with guard railing, exposing employees to the hazard of falls of up to 24 feet.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each employee on a scaffold, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level, is protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2013
Abate by
Jan 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $650 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502.  On or about November 01, 2012, employees were working at the very edge of the roof of the two story residential home, installing flashing around the chimney and they were not provided with fall protection, exposing employees to the hazard of falling up to approximately 8 feet.   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each employee working over 6 feet high is provided fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $650
  • — Z (S) $1600

View Tiger Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337167795.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.