Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY in 460 SKYMASTER DRIVE, BLDG. 680, TRAVIS AFB, CA 94535 (NAICS 445110). OSHA activity number 337213615.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Defense Commissary Agency — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Defense Commissary Agency is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
460 SKYMASTER DRIVE, BLDG. 680
City
TRAVIS AFB
State
CA
ZIP
94535
Mailing
460 SKYMASTER DRIVE, BLDG. 680, TRAVIS AFB, CA 94535
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
445110
Employees
39
Ownership type
D

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2013
Abate by
Feb 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:      a)  Building 680:  On or about October 31, 2012 and at times thereto, the employer did not have a written or worksite-specific procedure for respirator use when issuing a 3M-6000 series respirator which was provided to an employee.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2013
Abate by
Feb 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:      a)  Building 680:  On or about October 31, 2012 and at times thereto, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to an employee prior to issuing a 3M-6000 series respirator.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2013
Abate by
Feb 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):      a)  Building 680:  On or about October 31, 2012 and at times thereto, an employee was allowed to use a 3M-6000 series respirator prior to being fit-tested.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2013
Abate by
Feb 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:      a)  Building 680:  On or about October 31, 2012 and at times thereto, the employer did not provide training in the proper use, maintenance and limitations to an employee prior to issuing a 3M-6000 series respirator.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Defense Commissary Agency's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337213615.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.