Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VISUAL CITI

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of VISUAL CITI in 770 RAILROAD AVENUE, WEST BABYLON, NY 11707 (NAICS 323122). OSHA activity number 337279426.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Visual Citi — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Visual Citi is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VISUAL CITI
Site address
770 RAILROAD AVENUE
City
WEST BABYLON
State
NY
ZIP
11707
Mailing
770 RAILROAD AVENUE, WEST BABYLON, NY 11707
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323122
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2012
Abate by
Feb 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,310 · Current $1,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):     A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    a) Worksite, Spray Booth: Employees were provided with and where required to wear Elastomeric half face respirator. The employer did not develop or implement a written respiratory program including  training, medical evaluation, fit testting. facepiece seal protection, procedures for cleaning and storing and disinfecting of respirators; on or about 6/5/12.    b) Worksite, Laser Machine area: Employees were provided with and where required to wear Elastomeric half face respirator. The employer did not develop or implement a written respiratory program including  training, medical evaluation, fit testting. facepiece seal protection, procedures for cleaning and storing and disinfecting of respirators; on or about 6/5/12.        NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1150
  • — Z (S) $2310

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2012
Abate by
Feb 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):     The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:        a) Worksite, Spray Booth:  Employees were required to wear Elastomeric half face respirator without being provided with a medical evaluation prior to the employee's use of the respirator in the workplace; on or about 6/5/12.    b) Worksite, Laser machine area: Employees were required to wear Elastomeric half face respirator without being provided with a medical evaluation prior to the employee's use of the respirator in the workplace; on or about 6/5/12.    NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2012
Abate by
Feb 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):     Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:      a) Worksite, Spray Booth: Employee was required to wear Elastomeric half face respirator without being fit tested prior to the iniitial use of the respirator; on or about 6/5/12.    b Worksite, Laser machine area: Employee was required to wear Elastomeric half face respirator without being fit tested prior to the iniitial use of the respirator; on or about 6/5/12.      NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2012
Abate by
Feb 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3):     Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:     a) Worksite, Spray booth: Employee was required to wear Elastomeric half face respirator and was not provided with respiratory protection training prior to being required to wear a respirator at the workplace; on or about 6/5/12.    b) Worksite, Laser machine area: Employee was required to wear Elastomeric half face respirator and was not provided with respiratory protection training prior to being required to wear a respirator at the workplace; on or about 6/5/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2012
Abate by
Dec 21, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,850 · Current $1,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1):     Circular handfed crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:    (a) Worksite, Fabrication area:  Employees operating Delta Unisaw to cut pieces of wood were exposed to the unguarded blade; on or about 6/5/12.      NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1900
  • — Z (S) $3850

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2012
Abate by
Feb 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,310 · Current $1,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) Worksite: The employer did not implement a written Hazard Communication Program for employees who used and were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to Spray Glue, Methyl Ethyl Ketone, Air Compressor Oil; on or about 6/5/12.    NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1150
  • — Z (S) $2310

1910.1200 H

Serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2012
Abate by
Feb 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h):     Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced in              a) Worksite: The employer did not provide training on Hazard Communication Program for employees who used and were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to Spray Glue, Methyl Ethyl Ketone, Air Compressor Oil; on or about 6/5/12.    NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337279426.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.