Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: UNICEP PACKAGING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of UNICEP PACKAGING, INC. in 1702 INDUSTRIAL DR., SANDPOINT, ID 83864 (NAICS 488991). OSHA activity number 337318828.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Unicep Packaging, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Unicep Packaging, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1702 INDUSTRIAL DR.
City
SANDPOINT
State
ID
ZIP
83864
Mailing
1702 INDUSTRIAL DR., SANDPOINT, ID 83864
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488991
Employees
120
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 D05 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 15, 2013
Abate by
Mar 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $1,530 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(5)(v):  Material creating fire exposure hazard to the flammable liquids was stored in the same area:     a.)	Receiving and Warehouse Storage: Flammable liquids were stored with oxidizers and were not separated by at least 25 feet as required by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, thereby exposing employees to potential fire hazard.    Note: Abatement certification is required for this item
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1530
  • — Z (S) $3060

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 15, 2013
Abate by
Mar 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from liquid chemicals, acids or caustics:     a.)	Analytical Laboratory:  Tight fitting chemical splash goggles were not provided and used by employees dispensing and using acids in laboratory procedures.    Note: Abatement certification is required for this item
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 15, 2013
Abate by
Mar 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a.)	Receiving Area:  The flow of water through the flushing nozzles for the plumbed eyewash was substantially reduced.  Inadequate water supply at the nozzles did not allow flushing water to both eyes simultaneously.     Note: Abatement certification is required for this item
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1450 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 15, 2013
Abate by
Mar 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(1): Where hazardous chemicals were used in the workplace, the employer did not develop and carry out the provisions of a written Chemical Hygiene Plan which was capable of protecting employees from health hazards associated with hazardous chemicals and which was capable of keeping exposures below the limits specified in 29 CFR 1910. 1450(c):    a.)	Analytical Laboratory:  Employees were conducting laboratory procedures and chemical analysis without the benefit of a chemical hygiene plan.    Note: Abatement certification is required for this item
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 15, 2013
Abate by
Apr 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $1,530 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:     a.)	Machine Technicians and other employees at the Compounding, Filling and Packaging Facility were servicing and maintaining machines and equipment including, but not limited to, Nordenmatic 700 and ALP Molding machines, were using a generic lockout/tagout procedure.  Specific lockout/tagout procedures were not developed and used for machines and equipment with various types of energy and energy isolating devices.    Note: Abatement certification is required for this item
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1530
  • — Z (S) $3060

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 15, 2013
Abate by
Mar 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,590 · Current $2,295 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts:    a.)	 Machine Shop:  The Acer brand 10-inch metal lathe was not equipped with a chuck safety guard.    Note: Abatement certification is required for this item
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2295
  • — Z (S) $4590

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 15, 2013
Abate by
Mar 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:    a.)	 Machine Shop:  A Rexon 16.5-inch drill press was not secured to the floor.    Note: Abatement certification is required for this item
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 15, 2013
Abate by
Mar 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:    a.)	Gaviscon Bottle Line, Shrink Wrap Machine:  The six-inch sprocket and chain were not protected or equipped with a safety guard.  Employees were exposed to the hazard of inadvertent contact with the sprocket and chain and the ingoing nip point.    Note: Abatement certification is required for this item
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 I02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 15, 2013
Abate by
Mar 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(i)(2): Revolving surfaces of shaft coupling(s) were not covered by a safety sleeve:    a.)	Lee Mixer:  The shaft coupling was not equipped with an enclosure or other means of a safety barrier to prevent inadvertent physical contact with the revolving coupling.    Note: Abatement certification is required for this item
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 7 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 15, 2013
Abate by
Mar 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $1,913 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    a.)	Micro Dose Washroom:  Compressed air at over 100 p.s.i. was used through an air nozzle to clean and dry equipment.  b.)	Micro Dose Small Parts Room:  Compressed air at over 100 p.s.i. was used through an air nozzle to air dry equipment.  c.)	Machine Shop:  Compressed air at over 100 p.s.i. was used through air nozzles to blow off metal shavings of the drill press and other fabrication equipment.    Note: Abatement certification is required for this item
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1912.5
  • — Z (S) $3825

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337318828.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.