Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RAGE CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of RAGE CORPORATION in 3949 LYMAN DRIVE, HILLIARD, OH 43026 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 337396212.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rage Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rage Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RAGE CORPORATION
Site address
3949 LYMAN DRIVE
City
HILLIARD
State
OH
ZIP
43026
Mailing
3949 LYMAN DRIVE, HILLIARD, OH 43026
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
60
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Jan 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):     The employer shall administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response) or, equivalently, a dose of fifty percent. For purposes of the hearing conservation program, employee noise exposures shall be computed in accordance with appendix A and Table G-16a, and without regard to any attenuation provided by the use of personal protective equipment.    a. The employer had not developed and implemented a hearing conservation program for employees working in the bloe mold area. A blow mold operator was exposed to continuous noise at 93.45% on November 9, 2012 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 89.5 dBA during the 471 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 9 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1428
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Feb 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1):     The employer shall establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided in this paragraph by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.      a. The employer had not developed and implemented an audiometric testing program for employees working in the blow mold area. A blow mold operator was exposed to continuous noise at 93.45% on November 9, 2012 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 89.5 dBA during the 471 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 9 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1428
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.95 I03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Jan 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(3):     Employees shall be given the opportunity to select their hearing protectors from a variety of suitable hearing protectors provided by the employer.    a. The employer did not provide a variety of hearing protectors to employees working in the blow mold area. A blow mold operator was exposed to continuous noise at 93.45% on November 9, 2012 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 89.5 dBA during the 471 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 9 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Feb 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1):     The employer shall train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of this section. The employer shall institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program.      a. The employer had not developed and implemented a training program for employees working in the blow mold area. A blow mold operator was exposed to continuous noise at 93.45% on November 9, 2012 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 89.5 dBA during the 471 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 9 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1428
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.212 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,131 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.    a. In the tool and die area, the rotating chuck on the Wasino lathe (Model number LPT-35C, Machine number 3438) was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1130.5
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 18, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,131 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:    a. At the workplace, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication for hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, mold cleaners, grease, and oil.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1130.5
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Feb 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and material safety data sheets.    a. At the workplace, the employer did not provide employees with information and training for hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, mold cleaners, grease, and oil.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Feb 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):     The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.    a. At the workplace, the employer did not verify that the workplace hazard assessment had been conducted by completing a written certification for employees exposed to hazard such as, but not limited to, welding and noise.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2012
Abate by
Dec 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii):   Flexible cords and cables shall be connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided that will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.  a. Near injection molding machine C-7, strain relief was not provided on the Air Master fan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Rage Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337396212.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.