SOUTH WINDSOR, CT —
OSHA Inspection: THE HARTFORD PROVISION COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of THE HARTFORD PROVISION COMPANY in 625 NUTMEG ROAD NORTH, SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074 (NAICS 424410). OSHA activity number 337448617.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE HARTFORD PROVISION COMPANY
- Site address
- 625 NUTMEG ROAD NORTH
- City
- SOUTH WINDSOR
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06074
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 1228, SOUTH WINDSOR, CT 06074
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424410
- Employees
- 160
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- May 13, 2013
- Abate by
- May 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed: Warehouse, Aisle 214, Slot 98: On or about January, 30, 2013, a portion of the racking system was obstructing access to the emergency exit
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3600
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- May 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,400 · Current $3,240 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: Establishment: The employer's hazard assessment did not assess the need for, nor require the use of, footwear for selectors and drivers to designed to protect against impact, compression, puncture hazards and slippery walking /working surfaces.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3240
- — C (S) $5400
- — Z (S) $5400
1910.136 A
- Issued
- May 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards: Warehouse: On or about January 30, 2013, an employee selecting product during his shift was not wearing protective footwear while working in areas where there was a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects that could pierce the sole.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at The Hartford Provision Company
View The Hartford Provision Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424410)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337448617.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.