Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: THOMAS & BETTS CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of THOMAS & BETTS CORPORATION in 5601 EAST HIGHLAND DRIVE, JONESBORO, AR 72401 (NAICS 334419). OSHA activity number 337511216.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Thomas & Betts Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Thomas & Betts Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5601 EAST HIGHLAND DRIVE
City
JONESBORO
State
AR
ZIP
72401
Mailing
5601 EAST HIGHLAND DRIVE, JONESBORO, AR 72401
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334419
Employees
9500
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.124 B04 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2013
Abate by
Apr 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $3,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.124(b)(4)(ii):     Mechanical ventilation did not conform to NFPA 34-1995, Standard for Dip Tanks Containing Flammable or Combustible Liquids:      On or about November 20, 2012 and at times prior thereto, in the plating line area, the employer did not provide an operable exhaust ventilation system. Employees performing plating activities were exposed to open-tank chemical constituents including chromates, caustics, zinc, muriatic and nitric acids that become airborne due to tank agitation, tank temperature, evaporation, dipping of parts, parts moving along on hanging conveyors and batch changing activities.  This condition exposed employees to potential fire and inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3300
  • — Z (S) $5500

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2013
Abate by
Mar 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $1,980 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):     The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    On or about November 20, 2012, at the plating line area, the employer did not perform a hazard assessment to necessitate the use of respirators for employees performing tasks including but not limited to dispensing muriatic acid, chromates, nitric acids, caustics, zinc and spraying paints containing ethyl benzene and xylene [OSHA PEL: 100 ppm] on parts. This condition exposed employees to inhalation, ingestion, contact and absorption hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1980
  • — Z (S) $3300

1910.304 G07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2013
Abate by
Mar 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(7):     Nonelectrical equipment. The metal parts of the following nonelectrical equipment shall be grounded: frames and tracks of electrically operated cranes and hoists; frames of nonelectrically driven elevator cars to which electric conductors are attached; hand-operated metal shifting ropes or cables of electric elevators; and metal partitions, grill work, and similar metal enclosures around equipment of over 750 volts between conductors.    On or about February 7, 2013 and at times prior thereto, at the third open-tank caustic bath, the employer did not effectively ground frame of hoisting equipment. As a result sparks were observed above the electrical conductors, when the conveyer hoist placed and released copper rack containing parts into the caustic bath. This created a condition exposes employees to electrical shock and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.1026 D02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2013
Abate by
Mar 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $3,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i):     The employer did representative sampling instead of sampling all employees; however, the employer did not sample the employee(s) expected to have the highest chromium (VI) exposures:    On or about November 20, 2012, at the plating area, the employer did not sample the employee(s) who were expected to have the highest exposure to chromium (VI) while performing work-related tasks including dispensing chromate, cleaning chromate baths, and batch changing activities. This practice created a condition for exposure to airborne hazards to chromate mists and fumes due to tank agitation, tank temperature, dipping of parts, parts moving along on hanging conveyors and batch changing activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3300
  • — Z (S) $5500

1910.134 C02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2013
Abate by
Mar 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2):     The employer did not develop and implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with sections i and ii of this paragraph (c)(2) for employees who chose to wear respirators where respirator use was not required:    On or about November 20, 2012, at the conduits and fittings paint booth, the employer did not develop and implement a respiratory protection program and provide employees voluntary using respirators with the information contained in Appendix D ("information for Employees Using Respirators When Not Required Under the Standard"). Employees performing painting operations were voluntarily using particulate respirators for exposure to paint particulates and dust. This condition exposed employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2013
Abate by
Mar 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):     The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):    On or about November 20, 2012, in the plating line area, employees on each shift were not ensured that material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical were provided and readily accessible in the work area for immediate access without barriers such as, but not limited to, electronic access and Supervisors office.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Thomas & Betts Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337511216.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.