Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SYSTECH HANDLING, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of SYSTECH HANDLING, INC. in 120 TAYLOR PARKWAY, ARCHBOLD, OH 43502 (NAICS 333999). OSHA activity number 337699011.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Systech Handling, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Systech Handling, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
120 TAYLOR PARKWAY
City
ARCHBOLD
State
OH
ZIP
43502
Mailing
120 TAYLOR PARKWAY, ARCHBOLD, OH 43502
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333999
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2013
Abate by
May 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training:       1.) On or about December 5, 2012,  The employer failed to implement the elements of a written hazard communication program.  Employees were exposed to hazards from organic vapors such as, but not limited to, Xylene, Benzene, Acetone, Toluene and n-Butyl Acetate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2013
Abate by
May 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    1.) On or about December 5, 2012, the employer failed to train employees on the elements of a written hazard communication program including the hazards of the chemicals in their work area.  Employees were exposed to hazards from organic vapors such as, but not limited to, Xylene, Benzene, Acetone, Toluene and n-Butyl Acetate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2013
Abate by
May 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):     The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    1.)  On or about December 5, 2012, the employer failed to provide employees who were required to wear tight-fitting half mask respirators with medical evaluations to determine if the employee was fit to wear a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2013
Abate by
May 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):     In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures which includes provisions (i) through (ix) of this subparagraph, as applicable:       1.) On or about December 5, 2012, , the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program which covered employees who wore a half face respirator while performing paint spraying operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2013
Abate by
Apr 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1):     The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test as stated in this paragraph;    1.) On or about December 5, 2012, the employer failed to ensure employees who were required to wear tight-fitting half mask respirators were fit tested to determine if the respirator seal was adequate.  The employees were exposed to hazards from organic vapors such as, but not limited to, Xylene, Benzene, Acetone, Toluene and n-Butyl Acetate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2013
Abate by
Apr 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A):     Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:    1.) On or about December 5, 2012, the employer failed to ensure employees who were required to wear tight-fitting half mask respirators were clean shaven.  Employees were exposed to hazards from organic vapors such as, but not limited to, Xylene, Benzene, Acetone, Toluene and n-Butyl Acetate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2013
Abate by
May 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k):     The employer did not provide effective training to employees who were required to use respirators:      1.) On or about December 5 2012, the employer failed to provide training on the necessity of a respirator, how to recognize the limitations and capabilities of a respirator, and how to inspect and maintain a respirator to employees who were required to wear half mask tight-fitting respirators while painting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Systech Handling, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337699011.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.