Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J. T. CULLEN CO., INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J. T. CULLEN CO., INC. in 901 31ST AVENUE, FULTON, IL 61252 (NAICS 332313). OSHA activity number 337706022.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J. T. Cullen CO., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J. T. Cullen CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
901 31ST AVENUE
City
FULTON
State
IL
ZIP
61252
Mailing
P. O. BOX 311, FULTON, IL 61252
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332313
Employees
86
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1340D150

OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that fuel tanks were not placed a safe distance away from structures and did not ensure the fuel tanks and dispensing equipment did not leak fuel:    (a) On or about December 6, 2012, the gasoline and diesel fuel tanks were located seven (7) feet away from the production building.  The diesel fuel tank dispensing system was leaking diesel fuel and the hose was cracked.  The employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards working with and around these fuel tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.106 G03 IV D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1340D150

29 CFR 1910.106(g)(3)(iv)(d): The dispensing units, except those attached to containers, was not mounted either on a concrete island or protected against collision damage by suitable means:    (a) On or about December 6, 2012, the gasoline and diesel fuel tanks and dispensing units were not mounted or otherwise protected from collision by vehicles.      No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8370

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    (a) On or about December 6, 2012, the employer did not ensure that the employees operating and monitoring the plasma cutters wore eye protection that had the appropriate shade number to protect the eyes from the radiant energy (light radiation) given off by the plasma cutting head when in operation.    No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.178 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:    (a) On or about December 6, 2012, the employer did not remove the Clark forklift (Model No. CGC2S, Serial No. C365L-0441-9394FB) from service.  The forklift was not in a safe operating condition because its left set of rear signal lights were missing and the right set of rear signal lights did not indicated when the truck was braking or operating in reverse.    No abatement certification or documentation is required of this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 47 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service, or were placed in service if the examination showed conditions adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle:    (a) On or about December 6, 2012, the employer did not examine the Clark forklift (Model No. CGC2S, Serial No. C365L-0441-9394FB) before placing the lift into service.  The forklift was not in a safe operating condition because its left set of rear signal lights were missing and the right set of rear signal lights did not indicated when the truck was braking or operating in reverse.    No abatement certification or documentation is required of this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 J03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2013
Abate by
Mar 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): Complete inspections of the crane was not being performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section:    (a)  On or about December 6, 2012, the employer did not conduct periodic inspections of the 12 overhead cranes located in the machine shop and product areas.  Employees were exposed to stuck-by hazards if falling loads.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 F05 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1340D150

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:    (a)  On or about December 6, 2012, the employer did not ensure that the unleaded gasoline fuel tank, located outside the east end of the building, was labeled with the the appropriate hazard warnings.  Gasoline is a Class I flammable liquid.      (b) On or about December 6, 2012, the employer did not ensure that the diesel fuel tank, located outside the east end of the building, was labeled with the appropriate hazard warnings.  Diesel fuel is a Class II combustible liquid.    No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

View J. T. Cullen CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337706022.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.