Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FERRY CAP & SET SCREW COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FERRY CAP & SET SCREW COMPANY in 13300 BRAMLEY AVE., LAKEWOOD, OH 44107 (NAICS 332722). OSHA activity number 337738215.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ferry CAP & SET Screw Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ferry CAP & SET Screw Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
13300 BRAMLEY AVE.
City
LAKEWOOD
State
OH
ZIP
44107
Mailing
13300 BRAMLEY AVE., LAKEWOOD, OH 44107
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332722
Employees
90
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 90 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2013
Abate by
May 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    On or about December 07, 2012, the employer did not review the energy control procedure at least annually.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 90 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2013
Abate by
May 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operators performance was not conducted at least once every 3 years:    On or about December 7, 2012, the employer did not conduct an evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator at least once every 3 years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 90 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2013
Abate by
Aug 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a) On or about December 7, 2012, the employer did not adequately guard the gears on the Header #50 to protect employees from the rotating parts.    b) On or about December 7, 2012, the employer did not adequately guard the Asset Number J04-5 #40 to protect employees from the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 90 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2013
Abate by
Apr 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work:    On or about December 07, 2012, the Baldor grinder in use in the Header department, right wheel, work rest in place to support the grinding work was not maintained to a one-eighth inch maximum opening.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 90 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2013
Abate by
Apr 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel:    On or about December 07, 2012, the Baldor grinder, in use in the heading department, right wheel, had no tongue guard in place to maintain the one-fourth inch minimum opening.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 90 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2013
Abate by
Apr 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:      On or about December 07, 2012, the electrical panel marked L2-21 was open and had unused openings in the box exposing employees to live electrical when accessing the breakers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.95 G08 II B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 90 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2013
Abate by
Apr 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(8)(ii)(B): Unless a physician determines that the standard threshold shift is not work-related or aggravated by occupational noise exposure, the employer did not ensure, when a standard threshold shift occurs, that for employees already using hearing protectors, employees be refitted and retrained in the use of hearing protectors and provided with hearing protectors offering greater attenuation if necessary:    On or about December 07, 2012, the employer did not have employees refitted and retrained on the use of hearing protectors when standard threshold shift was identified.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2013
Abate by
May 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    On or about December 7, 2012, the workplace hazard assessment had not been certified with the person conducting the evaluation and the dates the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 90 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2013
Abate by
Apr 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:    On or about December 7, 2012, the employer did not make an ABC fire extinguisher readily accessible to employees located near the Header #50. The fire extinguisher was missing but the sign was still indicatiing a fire extinguisher was available for use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.179 J02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 90 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2013
Abate by
May 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): The following items were not inspected for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections:    On or about December 7, 2012, the company was not performing frequent inspections (daily to monthly intervals) of the company's overhead cranes, located in the heading department.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Ferry CAP & SET Screw Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337738215.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.