Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ARTHUR VINCENT & SONS COMPANY INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ARTHUR VINCENT & SONS COMPANY INC. in 70 CIANCI ST., PATERSON, NJ 07501 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 337759211.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Arthur Vincent & Sons Company INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Arthur Vincent & Sons Company INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
70 CIANCI ST.
City
PATERSON
State
NJ
ZIP
07501
Mailing
16 SOUTH FRANKLIN ST., NYACK, NY 10960
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6):   The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:   a) On scaffold: Employee was using an extension cord with a missing ground pin to energize a Bosch electric drill, on or about 12/6/2012.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.405 A02 II I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I):     Protection was not provided to avoid damage to flexible cords and cables used for temporary wiring which passed through doorways or other pinch points:    a) Basement door: Employees were using an unprotected pinched extension cord going through a metal door, on or about 12/06/2012.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G04 XV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv):   Crossbracing used in place of a toprail was not acceptable because the crossing point of two braces is not between 38 inches (0.97 m) and 48 inches (1.3 m) above the work platform.  The endpoints at each upright were more than 48 inches (1.3 m) apart.   a) On scaffold: Employees were loading tools and materials through a scaffold frame that was missing a top rail being exposed to a fall of approximately 80 feet to a concrete floor, on or about 12/6/2012.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Arthur Vincent & Sons Company INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337759211.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.