Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COLOMBO N.A., INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of COLOMBO N.A., INC. in 1301 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD, ADEL, GA 31620 (NAICS 333111). OSHA activity number 337860613.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Colombo N.A., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Colombo N.A., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
COLOMBO N.A., INC.
Site address
1301 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD
City
ADEL
State
GA
ZIP
31620
Mailing
1301 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD, ADEL, GA 31620
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333111
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 E02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
Jul 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced

Hazardous substances 24602590

29 CFR 1910.107(e)(2): Bulk storage of portable containers of flammable liquids or liquids with a flashpoint greater than 199.4 °F (93 °C) were not in a separate, constructed building detached from other important buildings or cut off in a standard manner:    a) At the warehouse, on or about and at times prior to December 12, 2012, portable containers of flammable liquids used in the spray painting operations were not stored in a storage room or storage cabinet, and were located in the vicinity of the spray painting area, exposing employees to a fire hazard.     ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.107 G07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
Jul 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced

Hazardous substances 24602590

29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7):     "No smoking" signs in large letters on contrasting color background were not conspicuously posted at all spraying areas and paint storage rooms:    a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to December 12, 2012, an employee spray painted peanut combine metal components with flammable organic solvents paints and the employer did not post "No Smoking" signs in the designated paint spray area, exposing employees to burns resulting from exposure to a flammable organic solvent paint fueled fire.     ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
May 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1):     Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries.    a) In the warehouse, on or about December 12, 2012 and at times prior to, a fire extinguisher was not mounted and was on the floor in the area designated by the employer to store chemicals such as, but not limited to paints, exposing employees to a fire hazard.      ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS NOT REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $680
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
Jul 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:    a) Throughout the warehouse, on or about December 12, 2012 and at times prior to, the employer did not develop or implement an educational program to ensure that employees were trained to use portable fire extinguishers, resulting in a fire hazard.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1052 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
Jul 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(2):     The employer did not perform initial monitoring to determine each employee's exposure to methylene chloride:    a) In the welding department, on or about December 12, 2012 and at times prior to, an initial exposure determination was not performed for employees who used Radnor Anti-Spatter and Nozzle Shield (Aerosol) containing methylene chloride to prevent spatter build up during MIG welding operations, resulting in a chemical hazard.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1052 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
Jul 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(h)(1):     Where needed to prevent methylene chloride induced skin or eye irritation, the employer did not provide clean protective clothing and equipment resistant to methylene chloride, at no cost to the employee, and/or did not ensure that each affected employee used it:    a) In the welding department, on or about December 12, 2012 and at times prior to, chemical resistant gloves were not worn by employees who used Radnor Anti-Spatter and Nozzle Shield (Aerosol) containing methylene chloride to clean the metal while MIG welding, resulting in a chemical hazard.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1052 I02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
Jul 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(i)(2):     It was reasonably foreseeable that an employee's eyes may contact solutions containing 0.1 percent or greater methylene chloride and the employer did not provide appropriate eyewash facilities within the immediate work area for emergency use:    a) In the welding department, on or about December 12, 2012 and at times prior to, an emergency eyewash station was not provided for employees who used Radnor Anti-Spatter and Nozzle Shield (Aerosol) containing methylene chloride to clean the metal while MIG welding, resulting in a chemical hazard.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1052 L01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
Jul 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR 1910.1052(l)(1):    The employer did not provide information and training for each affected employee prior to or at the time of initial assignment to a job involving potential exposure to methylene chloride:    a) In the welding department, on or about December 12, 2012 and at times prior to, information and training on the health hazards associated with exposure to methylene chloride were not provided for employees who used methylene chloride containing Radnor Anti-Spatter and Nozzle Shield (Aerosol) containing methylene chloride to clean the metal while MIG welding, resulting in a chemical hazard.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
Jul 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):     The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:     a) At the warehouse, on or about December 12, 2012 and at times prior to, the employer did not document their job hazard assessment with a written certification for employees who used personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to safety glasses, gloves, welding helmets.     ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
Jun 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced

Hazardous substances 246025872590

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):     A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:     a) At the warehouse, on or about December 12, 2012 and at times prior to, the employer did not develop or implement a written respiratory protection program for employees who were required to wear half mask respirators during spray painting/sanding applications and for employees who were provided with half mask respirators for voluntary use while performing welding operations during the assembly of peanut combines, resulting in a respiratory and dermal hazards.      ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $200
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
Jul 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):    The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to December 12, 2012, the employer did not develop or implement a written Hazard Communication program for employees working with chemicals such as, but not limited to paints, exposing employees to a chemical hazard.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $200
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2013
Abate by
Jul 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1):    Chemical manufacturers and importers did not obtain or develop a material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical they produce or import. Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use.    a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to December 12, 2012, the employer did not provide Safety Data Sheets for chemicals used by employees to perform their duties, exposing employees to chemical hazards.     ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Colombo N.A., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337860613.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.