NEW HAVEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ATTICUS BAKERY LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ATTICUS BAKERY LLC in 360 JAMES STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06513 (NAICS 311812). OSHA activity number 337950414.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ATTICUS BAKERY LLC
- Site address
- 360 JAMES STREET
- City
- NEW HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06513
- Mailing
- 360 JAMES STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06513
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311812
- Employees
- 185
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.146 C01
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- May 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces. Production Area: The employer did not perform an evaluation of the workplace to determine if there were any work spaces that were considered permit required confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1620
- — Z (S) $2700
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- May 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces. A sign reading DANGER-PERMIT-REQUIRED CONFINED SPACE, DO NOT ENTER or using other similar language would satisfy the requirement for a sign. Production Area: The employer did not post danger signs on the Permit Required Confined Spaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years. Production Area: The employer did not evaluatie of the performance of the powered industrial truck operators at least every three years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2160
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.307 C02 I
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
9135
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.307(c)(2)(i): Equipment in hazardous (classified) location(s) was not approved for the ignitable or combustible properties of the specific gas, vapor, dust, or fiber that was or could be present. Production Area: The electrical wall panels, such as but not limited to, Panel PP-1, Panel PP-2 and Panel LP-1 were not approved for a Class 2, Division II locations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2160
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9135
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment. Production Area: The employer did not perform a specific Personal Protective Equipment assessment for the bread making line operators since 12/2004 when the RHEON and WP lines were installed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9135
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer. Production Department: The employer did not provide the information in Appendix D for their employees who wear the Safety Zone RS-810 particulate filtering facepiece respirator on a voluntary basis.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.263 L09 II
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- May 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8890
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.263(l)(9)(ii): All safety devices on the oven's were not inspected at intervals of not less than once a year by a representative of the oven manufacturer. Production Department: All safety devices of the two baking ovens (Gemini and Pavillari) were not inspected at least once a year by a representative of the oven Manufacturer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Atticus Bakery LLC
View Atticus Bakery LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311812)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337950414.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.