OSHA Inspection: RV PRODUCTS

Issued

Jan 7, 2013

Abate by

Feb 1, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,295 · Current $1,607 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    At 3050 N. St. Francis St, Wichita, KS, the employer did not ensure the employee using the Acer Drill Press was wearing appropriate eye protection, exposing the employee to an eye injury.

Issued

Jan 7, 2013

Abate by

Feb 1, 2013

Penalty

Initial $4,590 · Current $3,213 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    At 3050 N. St. Francis St, Wichita, KS, the employer did not ensure machinery was provided point of operation guarding, exposing employees to hazards associated with rotating parts, such as lacerations in the following instances:    1)  In the shop, the Acer Drill Press was not equipped with a chip guard.    2)  In the Tool Room, the Harrison 350 Lathe had not point of operations guard over the cutting area.