Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HOWARD JOHNSON

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HOWARD JOHNSON in 112 WEST BYERS AVENUE P.O. BOX 90, NEW STANTON, PA 15672 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 338070626.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Howard Johnson — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Howard Johnson is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HOWARD JOHNSON
Site address
112 WEST BYERS AVENUE P.O. BOX 90
City
NEW STANTON
State
PA
ZIP
15672
Mailing
112 WEST BYERS AVENUE P.O. BOX 90, NEW STANTON, PA 15672
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
May 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the dates of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:   a) In the facility, on or about January 2, 2013 - The employer did not verify through a written certification that the required workplace personal protective equipment hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
May 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement and maintain at the workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g) and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:  a) The employer did not develop and implement hazard communication program that outlines the criteria for the maintenance of material safety data sheets, container labeling and employee training were to be met for the specific hazards associated with the workplace.  The employees were exposed to chemicals contained in cleaning products such as, but not limited to hydrogen peroxide, dipropylene glycol n-propyl ether, and quaternary ammonium chloride.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
May 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:  a) In the facility, on or about January 2, 2013 - The employer did not ensure that plastic spray bottles containing cleaning products were labeled or marked with the identity of the chemicals contained therein.  The cleaning products contained hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to hydrogen peroxide, dipropylene glycol n-propyl ether, and quaternary ammonium chloride.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they are in their work area(s):   a) In the facility, on or about January 2, 2013 - The employer did not maintain copies of required material safety data aheets in the workplace for hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to sodium hypochlorite (bleach).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 16, 2013
Abate by
May 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area:   a) In the facility, on or about January 2, 2013 - The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals used in the workplace such as, but not limited to sodium hypochlorite, quaternary ammonium chlorides, and isopropyl alcohol.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Howard Johnson's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338070626.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.