HANNIBAL, MO —
OSHA Inspection: PRINTEX INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PRINTEX INC. in 401 S. MAPLE STREET, HANNIBAL, MO 63401 (NAICS 323113). OSHA activity number 338292410.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PRINTEX INC.
- Site address
- 401 S. MAPLE STREET
- City
- HANNIBAL
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63401
- Mailing
- 401 S. MAPLE STREET, HANNIBAL, MO 63401
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323113
- Employees
- 74
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
26 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 E02
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(2): Stair rails did not consist of a top rail, intermediate rail and/or posts, with the vertical height not more than 34 inches (86.36 cm) nor less than 30 inches (76.2 cm) from upper surface of top rail to surface of tread in line with the face of the riser forward edge of the tread: a/ Inside of the maintenance department, a metallic stairwell consisting of two tiers was equipped with stairrails along both sides. Both stairrails were missing an intermediate rail. The first tier consisted of ten risers. The second tier consisted of eight risers. The tread width was approximately 30 inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.37 B04
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent: a/ Throughout the three story building, suitable signs indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit discharge were not posted.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.37 B05
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet): a/ The doorway between the ink room and storage room was not marked by a suitable sign reading 'Not an Exit".
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.37 B07
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(7): Each exit sign did not have the word "Exit" in plainly legible letters not less than six inches (15.2 cm) high, with the principal strokes of the letters in the word "Exit" not less than three-fourths of an inch (1.9 cm) wide: a/ Inside of the elevator room, the metallic exit sign over the pedestrian exit leading to the fire escape was illegible.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.106 E02 II
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(ii): "Containers." Flammable or combustible liquids were not stored in tanks or closed containers: a/ Inside of the production department, a single, plastic container partially filled with Slick AR, a combustible liquid, was not closed. b/ Inside of the maintenance department, three, plastic containers partially filled with gasoline were not closed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: a/ A lockout/tagout program was not developed or utilized that consisted of specific written procedures, audits, and employee training for machinery such as the ten MHM Platten Presses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: Inside of the production department, specific procedures were not developed in writing or fully implemented for the following machinery: a/ MHM Platten Press, m/n SA120Z12, s/n 1538, 110 volts and 70 p.s.i. hydraulics. b/ MHM Platten Press, m/n SA140Z12, s/n 1550, 110 volts and 70 p.s.i. hydraulics. c/ MHM Platten Press, m/n SA120Z12, s/n 802, 110 volts and 70 p.s.i. hydraulics. d/ MHM Platten Press, m/n SA120Z12, s/n 880, 110 volts and 70 p.s.i. hydraulics. e/ MHM Platten Press, m/n SA120Z12, s/n 1439, 110 volts and 70 p.s.i. hydraulics. f/ MHM Platten Press, m/n SA80Z6, s/n 1072, 110 volts and 70 p.s.i. hydraulics. g/ MHM Platten Press, m/n SA120Z10, s/n 842, 110 volts and 70 p.s.i. hydraulics. h/ MHM Platten Press, m/n SA100Z10, s/n 805, 110 volts and 70 p.s.i. hydraulics. i/ MHM Platten Press, m/n SA120Z10, s/n 1018, 110 volts and 70 p.s.i. hydraulics. j/ MHM Platten Press, m/n SA80Z6, s/n 1076, 110 volts and 70 p.s.i. hydraulics.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: a/ Inside of the production department, annual audits of the specific lockout/tagout procedure for the ten MHM Platten Presses were not performed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 D04
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(d)(4): Portable fire extinguishers for use on Class B fires were not distributed so that the travel distance from the Class B hazard area to any extinguisher was 50 feet or less: a/ Inside of the production department, the travel distance between mounted, portable fire extinguishers was approximately 140 feet. A combustible cleaning solvent known as Slick AR was stored in open containers inside of this department.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: a/ Throughout the entire facility, the portable fire extinguishers were last inspected in 2010.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting: a/ Employees expected to fight incipient stage fires were not provided with a training program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace: a/ The operators of the Yale Fork Truck, m/n GLC050TGNVAE082, s/n E187V20915A, did not receive formal instruction.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): a/ The operators of the Yale Fork Truck, m/n GLC050TGNVAE082, s/n E187V20915A, were not certified.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): The Yale Fork Truck, m/n GLC050TGNVAE082, s/n E187V20915A, was defective in the following way: a/ The back-up alarm was not operational. b/ The emergency brake was not operational.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.252 A02 III A
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(a)(2)(iii)(A): The employer did not provide fire watchers whenever welding or cutting was performed in locations where other than a minor fire might develop: a/ Inside of the maintenance department, a fire watch was not provided whenever or plasma welding work occurred.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.252 B03
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(3): Employees exposed to the hazards created by welding, cutting, or brazing operations were not protected by personal protective equipment in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.132: a/ Inside of the maintenance department, flame retardant jackets, head gear, and pants were not provided to the employees who performs MIG welding and plasma cutting work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour: a/ Inside of the maintenance department, one oxygen cylinder was stored adjacent to a compressed gas cylinder containing acetylene.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: a/ Inside of the production department, adjacent to the wash tanks, a metallic, quad receptacle box used to power a floor mounted fan was not secured to a firm surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: a/ Inside of the elevator room, the receptacle box mounted on a steel column was missing a knockout.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 G01 IV D
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(D): Flexible cords were attached to building surfaces: a/ Inside of the packout room, an orange, flexible cord was wrapped around the structural column and beam. This flexible cord was providing power to a computer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.334 A02 II
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(ii): There was a defect or evidence of damage that could have exposes an employee to injury and the defective or damaged item was not removed from service: a/ Inside of the print shop, the outer insulation adjacent to the plug belonging to a flexible cord was missing. This flexible cord was powering a washout tank. b/ Inside of the maintenance department, the outer insulation adjacent to the plug belonging to a Blue Point Plasma Cutter was missing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a/ A hazard communications program was not developed in writing that addressed how proper container labeling, material data sheets, and employee training will be accomplished. a/ A written hazard communication program was not developed or implemented for exposed employees who use hazardous materials such as Rutland Screen Printing Plastisol and Slick AR.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not comply a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet: a/ A list of hazardous chemicals used within the workplace was not prepared.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a/ Inside of the production department, red, plastic containers of Slick AR, a press wash and combustible cleanser, were not labeled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a/ Employee training in the contents of an effective hazard communication program or in the safe handling, storage, and use of hazardous materials was not provided.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done: a/ A workplace hazard assessment was not certified.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Printex INC.
View Printex INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323113)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338292410.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.