Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: KOSER IRON WORKS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KOSER IRON WORKS, INC. in 150 N 18TH ST, BARRON, WI 54812 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 338297815.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Koser Iron Works, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Koser Iron Works, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
150 N 18TH ST
City
BARRON
State
WI
ZIP
54812
Mailing
150 N 18TH ST, BARRON, WI 54812
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Sep 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energization, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    a) Throughout the production area; The employer did not establish an energy isolation program including adequate training, machine specific procedures and periodic inspections for die changes, blade changes, servicing and maintenance activities on machines and equipment; such as but not limited to the 65 ton Franklin Machine and Foundry Company press shear, 150 ton Cyril Bath punch press, 175 ton Master Fab press brake, Promecam press brake, Peddington channel shear, Verson press, Wysong shear, Johnson band saws, Hyd-Mech band saw, Southbend metal lathe, Boschert Notcher and the DoAll vertical band saw.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Sep 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    a) Throughout the production area; The employer did not develop machine specific energy isolation procedures for machines and equipment; such as but not limited to the 65 ton Franklin Machine and Foundry Company press shear, 150 ton Cyril Bath punch press, 175 ton Master Fab press brake, Promecam press brake, Peddington channel shear, Verson press, Wysong shear, Johnson band saws, Hyd-Mech band saw, Southbend metal lathe, Boschert Notcher and the DoAll vertical band saw.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Sep 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that employees acquired the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage and removal of energy control devices:    a) Throughout the production area; The employer did not provide adequate training to the employees regarding energy isolation for machines and equipment; such as but not limited to the 65 ton Franklin Machine and Foundry Company press shear, 150 ton Cyril Bath punch press, 175 ton Master Fab press brake, Promecam press brake, Peddington channel shear, Verson press, Wysong shear, Johnson band saws, Hyd-Mech band saw, Southbend metal lathe, Boschert Notcher and the DoAll vertical band saw.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Sep 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:    a) Throughout the production area; The employees would not affix energy isolating devices prior to performing servicing and maintenance activities on machines and equipment; such as but not limited to the 65 ton Franklin Machine and Foundry Company press shear, 150 ton Cyril Bath punch press, 175 ton Master Fab press brake, Promecam press brake, Peddington channel shear, Verson press, Wysong shear, Johnson band saws, Hyd-Mech band saw, Southbend metal lathe, Boschert Notcher and the DoAll vertical band saw.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Sep 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):     a) Within the facility; Employees operating powered industrial vehicles; such as but not limited to the Kamatsu, the Lewis Shepard and the Northwestern Tow-Tractor, were not trained on safe operation including classroom training and hands on training under observation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Sep 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:    a) Within the facility; Employees did not perform inspections prior to operating powered industrial vehicles; such as but not limited to the Kamatsu, the Lewis Shepard and the Northwestern Tow-Tractor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $5,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a) Throughout the facility; The employees were exposed to hazards as adequate ingoing nip point, flying chip and rotating part guarding was not available on equipment such as but not limited to the 65 ton Franklin Machine and Foundry Company press shear, the 150 ton Cyril Bath punch press and the Southbend metal lathe. An employee suffered an amputation as a result of inadequate guarding on the Franklin Machine and Foundry Company press shear.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5250
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Sep 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    a) In the production area; The employees were exposed to hazards as point of operation guarding was not provided on equipment such as but not limited to the 175 ton Master Fab press brake and the 110 ton Promecam press brake.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Jul 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work:    a) In the maintenance area; The work rest on the bench grinder was not adjusted properly as the arm that the guard was affixed to was facing towards the floor rather than located up near the grinder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.217 C01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i): The employer did not provide and ensure the usage of point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power press(es);    a) In the production area; The employees were exposed to hazards as point of operation guarding was not on the mechanical power press including but not limited to the 65 ton Franklin Machine and Foundry Company mechanical press.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Jul 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    a) In the production area; The Southbend lathe does not have a guard on the pulley.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Jul 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs 42 inches or less from the floor level were not fully enclosed by guards conforming to requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    a) In the production area; The Southbend lathe does not have a guard on the drive belt.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Jan 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:    a) Within the facility; The employer did not perform noise sampling at the facility to determine the noise levels that the employees were exposed to. Information indicated that noise levels of 100 decibels were reached near the Franklin Machine and Foundry press.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2013
Abate by
Jul 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    a) Above the Southbend lathe; The electrical box was missing a prepunched knockout and the opening was not effectively closed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Koser Iron Works, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338297815.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.