Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FIN-TEK

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FIN-TEK in 6 LEO PLACE, WAYNE, NJ 07470 (NAICS 333318). OSHA activity number 338385636.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fin-Tek — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fin-Tek is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FIN-TEK
Site address
6 LEO PLACE
City
WAYNE
State
NJ
ZIP
07470
Mailing
6 LEO PLACE, WAYNE, NJ 07470
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333318
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1910.151(c):     Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:          a) Chemical storage room: Service technicians engaged in servicing ozone generators were handling phosphoric acid, but a suitable eyewash station was not provided thus exposing employees to corrosive chemicals, on or about 01/04/13.          Note: The eyewash unit must meet the requirement of American National Standard (ANSI Z358.1-1998)
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Apr 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):       a) Shop:  Service technicians engaged in servicing ozone generators were handling hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, phosphoric acid, caustic soda, and ammonia.   The employer did not develop and implement a worksite specific written hazard communication program, thus exposing employees to a potential health hazard, on or about 01/04/13.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2013
Abate by
Apr 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:      a) Shop: Information and training on the hazard(s) associated with exposure to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, phosphoric acid, caustic soda, and ammonia was not provided thus exposing employees to potential health hazards, on or about 01/04/13.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338385636.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.