Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CSA CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CSA CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 3607 E. 11TH PLACE EXTENSION, BIG SPRING, TX 79720 (NAICS 562998). OSHA activity number 338478647.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch CSA Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CSA Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3607 E. 11TH PLACE EXTENSION
City
BIG SPRING
State
TX
ZIP
79720
Mailing
2314 MCALLISTER ROAD, HOUSTON, TX 77092
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562998
Employees
120
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.146 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2013
Abate by
Jul 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,754 · Current $2,754
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1):   The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces was a permit-required confined space:     On or about January 24, 2013, at the job site located at 3607 E. 11th Place Extension, Big Spring, Texas 79720, employer did not evaluate waste water treatment basin as a permit required confined space.  Exposing employees to engulfment hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $2754
  • — C (S) $2754
  • — Z (S) $2754

1910.146 C07 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2013
Abate by
Jul 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(7)(iii):   Employer did not document the basis for determining that all hazards in a permit space had been eliminated, through a certification that contained the date, the location of the space, and the signature of the person making the determination. The certification was not made available to the employee entering the space or to that employee's authorized representative:     On or about January 24, 2013, at the job site located at 3607 E. 11th Place Extension, Big Spring, Texas 79720, employer did not provide to the employees entering a confined space documentation showing the hazard(s) in the permit required confined space had been eliminated before they entered.  Employees exposed to atmospheric hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C07 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2013
Abate by
Jul 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,754 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(7)(i):   Employer did not ensure the permit-required confined space posed no actual or potential atmospheric hazards and if all hazards within are eliminated without entry into space, the permit space may be reclassified as a non-permit confined space as long as the non-atmospheric hazards remain eliminated:     On January 24, 2013, at the work site located at 3607 E. 11th Place extension, Big Spring, Texas 79720.  The employer did not conduct an atmospheric test to determine if there were any atmospheric hazardous before employees entered confined space(s).  Employees were exposed to atmospheric hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $0
  • — C (S) $2754
  • — Z (S) $2754

1910.146 C08 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2013
Abate by
Aug 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,754 · Current $2,754
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(8)(i):  Employer did not inform the contractor that the workplace contained permit spaces and that permit space entry was allowed only through compliance with a permit space program meeting the requirements of this section:     On or about January 24, 2013, at the job site located at 3607 E. 11th Place Extension, Big Spring, Texas 79720, employer did not inform contractor the work being performed was permit required confined space.  Employees were exposed to engulfment.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $2754
  • — C (S) $2754
  • — Z (S) $2754

1910.146 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2013
Abate by
Aug 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,131 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1):   The employer did not provide training to the employees working on site with the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned:     On or about January 24, 2013, at the job site located at 3607 E. 11th Place Extension, Big Spring, Texas 79720, employer did not ensure the employees were trained in the hazards of working in a confined space.  Exposing employee engulfment.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $0
  • — C (S) $4131
  • — Z (S) $4131

1910.1200 H01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2013
Abate by
Jul 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $689 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area:   On or about January 24, 2013, at the job site located at 3607 E. 11th Place Extension, Big Spring, Texas 79720, employer did not ensure the employees working were properly trained in the hazards H2S  Exposing employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $0
  • — C (O) $689
  • — Z (O) $689

1910.157 E01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2013
Abate by
Jul 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(1):  The employer is responsible for the inspection, maintenance and testing of all portable fire extinguishers in the workplace:  On or about January 24, 2013, at the job site located at 3607 E. 11th Place Extension, Big Spring, Texas 79720, employer did not ensure the inspection was conducted on the fire extinguisher exposing employee to burns:  A.  Grove Model HO-158  B.  Superintendent's Office Trailer
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View CSA Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338478647.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.