Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: QSR CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of QSR CORPORATION in 300 LOCUST STREET, HARTFORD, CT 06114 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 338492648.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch QSR Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for QSR Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
QSR CORPORATION
Site address
300 LOCUST STREET
City
HARTFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06114
Mailing
300 LOCUST STREET, HARTFORD, CT 06114
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
24
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(ii): Category 3 flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 degrees F (37.8 degrees C), were dispensed into containers without the nozzle and container being electrically interconnected.  MANUFACTURING AREA:  On or about April 4, 2013, employees dispensed KEM BOND HS High Solids Alkyd Universal Metal Primer, a Category 3 flammable liquid with a flash point of 90 degrees F, from one 5-gallon metal container to another 5-gallon metal container used with the airless paint sprayer.  The containers were not bonded at the time of dispensing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.107 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(2): An open flame or spark producing equipment was present in the spraying area or within 20 feet thereof and not separated by a partition.  MANUFACTURING SHOP:  Flammable primer is applied to structural steel using a GRACO TITAN Model 495 Airless Paint Sprayer.  Non-class 1 electrical equipment such as, but not limited to, a Marvel Band Saw and work light were located within 20 feet of where the open spraying is conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.  MANUFACTURING SHOP:  On or about April 4, 2013, the employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program was established and implemented for those employees required to wear respiratory protection, including North Model 7700 Half Face Respirators equipped with organic vapor/P-100 cartridges.  Employees wear the respirator while applying primer to steel exposing them to chemicals including, but not limited to: ethylbenzene, xylene, methyl n-propyl ketone, and methyl n-amyl ketone.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i):   Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible.  On or about April 4, 2013, employees involved in welding activities who voluntarily wear N-100 particulate respirators were not provided with training in accordance with Appendix D.  Employees are exposed to welding fumes including, but not limited to: aluminum, iron, lithium fluoride, magnesium, manganese, nickel, potassium silicofluoride, silicon, sodium fluoride, titanium, and zirconium.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):   The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.  MANUFACTURING SHOP:  On or about April 4, 2013, the employer had not provided for an employee using a silicon half-face respirator to receive a medical evaluation prior to using the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.  MANUFACTURING SHOP:  Employees who apply solvent-based primer to manufactured steel products were not fit-tested prior to initial use of a North Model 7700 Half-Face Respirator.  The primer most often used contains solvents including xylene, ethylbenzene, methyl n-propyl ketone, and methyl n-amyl ketone.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve.  MANUFACTURING SHOP:  On or about April 4, 2013, a tight-fiiting half-face respirator used by an employee who primes manufactured steel products was observed to be stored in a flammable cabinet with paints/primers and other solvent-based chemicals.  The respirator was not stored in a container that would prevent it from being contaminated by solvents such as, but not limited to: ethylbenzene, xylene, methyl n-propyl ketone, and methyl n-amyl ketone.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):  MANUFACTURING SHOP:  On or about April 4, 2013, the employer did not provide effective training to employees who are required to use respirators while spraying primer on steel products manufactured at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1026 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Sep 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):    MANUFACTURING SHOP:  On or about January 31, 2013, the employer had not conducted a hazard determination to identify employee exposure to chromium (VI) as a result of MIG welding of steel using Flux Cored Welding Electrodes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program including the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):  MANUFACTURING SHOP:  On or about January 31, 2013, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program to provide information and training to employees regarding the safe use and handling of hazardous materials including, but not limited to, flammable paints, primers, welding rods, and compressed gases.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  MANUFACTURING SHOP:  On or about January 31, 2013, the employer had not provided effective information and training on hazardous materials in their work area including, but not limited to: flammable paints, primers, welding rods, and compressed gases.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View QSR Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338492648.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.