Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: QSR CORPORATION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of QSR CORPORATION in 300 LOCUST STREET, HARTFORD, CT 06114 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 338987860.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch QSR Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for QSR Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
QSR CORPORATION
Site address
300 LOCUST STREET
City
HARTFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06114
Mailing
300 LOCUST STREET, HARTFORD, CT 06114
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
24
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $850 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing hazards:   On or about April 4, 2013, in the Yard:  In the following instances, an employee was observed operating powered industrial trucks without wearing the provided seatbelt:  A. TCM FHG36 propane powered fork truck. B. Mitsubishi Model FG40 propane powered fork truck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $850
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.178 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place:   On or about April 4, 2013, in the Yard:  The load rating chart for the Mitsubishi Model FG40 powered industrial truck was missing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $680
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.178 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:   On or about April 4, 2013, in the Yard:  The emergency brake on the Mitsubishi FG40 propane powered industrial truck was out of adjustment and the truck had not been taken out of service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:   On or about April 4, 2013, the employer did not ensure that powered industrial trucks in use on site were examined before being placed into service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $850 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:   On or about April 4, 2013, the employer had not documented re-evaluation of powered industrial truck operator's performance within three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $850
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
May 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $850 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:   On or about April 4, 2013, in the Main Shop:  The unused portion of the blade on the Marvel Series 8, Mark II metal cutting band saw was not guarded to within 1/4 inch of the piece being cut.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $850
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jul 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $510 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:   On or about April 4, 2013 in the Main Shop:  The Ridgid drill press, Model DP15000, was not secured to the floor to prevent it from walking or moving during operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $510
  • — Z (S) $1020

View QSR Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338987860.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.