Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL, INC. in 1340 HAL GREER BOULEVARD, HUNTINGTON, WV 25701 (NAICS 622110). OSHA activity number 338597040.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cabell Huntington Hospital, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cabell Huntington Hospital, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1340 HAL GREER BOULEVARD
City
HUNTINGTON
State
WV
ZIP
25701
Mailing
1340 HAL GREER BOULEVARD, HUNTINGTON, WV 25701
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
622110
Employees
2200
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1904.29 B04

Other-than-serious 10 instances 70 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $850 · Current $850
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(4): A form with equivalent information to OSHA's 301, Injury and Illness Incident Report, was not used by the employer to document each recordable injury and illness entered on the OSHA 300 Log:     (a)  Office Area:  The CHH-636 form used for Case #002 for Calendar Year 2013 was found not to be equivalent to the OSHA 301 in that it did not include the employee's date of hire, the title of the person completing the form, the date the form was completed, and the phone number of the person completing the form, as determined on January 30, 2013.    (b) Office Area:  The CHH-636 form used for Case #003 for Calendar Year 2013 was found not to be equivalent to the OSHA 301 in that it did not include the employee's date of hire, the title of the person completing the form, the date the form was completed, and the phone number of the person completing the form, as determined on January 30, 2013    (c) Office Area:  The CHH-636 form used for Case #004 for Calendar Year 2013 was found not to be equivalent to the OSHA 301 in that it did not include the employee's date of hire, the title of the person completing the form, the date the form was completed, and the phone number of the person completing the form, as determined on January 30, 2013    (d) Office Area:  The CHH-636 form used for Case #005 for Calendar Year 2013 was found not to be equivalent to the OSHA 301 in that it did not include the employee's date of hire, the title of the person completing the form, the date the form was completed, and the phone number of the person completing the form, as determined on January 30, 2013.    (e) Office Area:  The CHH-636 form used for Case #006 for Calendar Year 2013 was found not to be equivalent to the OSHA 301 in that it did not include the employee's date of hire, the title of the person completing the form, the date the form was completed, and the phone number of the person completing the form, as determined on January 30, 2013.    (f) Office Area:  The CHH-636 form used for Case #007 for Calendar Year 2013 was found not to be equivalent to the OSHA 301 in that it did not include the employee's date of hire, the title of the person completing the form, the date the form was completed, and the phone number of the person completing the form, as determined on January 30, 2013.    (g) Office Area:  The CHH-636 form used for Case #008 for Calendar Year 2013 was found not to be equivalent to the OSHA 301 in that it did not include the employee's date of hire, the title of the person completing the form, the date the form was completed, and the phone number of the person completing the form, as determined on January 30, 2013.    (h) Office Area:  The CHH-636 form used for Case #009 for Calendar Year 2013 was found not to be equivalent to the OSHA 301 in that it did not include the employee's date of hire, the title of the person completing the form, the date the form was completed, and the phone number of the person completing the form, as determined on January 30, 2013.    (i) Office Area:  The CHH-636 form used for Case #010 for Calendar Year 2013 was found not to be equivalent to the OSHA 301 in that it did not include the employee's date of hire, the title of the person completing the form, the date the form was completed, and the phone number of the person completing the form, as determined on January 30, 2013.      ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $850

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 70 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2013
Abate by
Jun 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $850 · Current $850
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent), was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation:   (a)  Office Area:  The log for recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300) for Calendar Year 2013 was found incomplete in that for Case #009 had been marked as a days away from work case (Column H) and zero days away were recorded (Column K), as determined on January 31, 2013.   (b)  Office Area:  The log for recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300) for Calendar Year 2013 was found incomplete in that for Case #010 had been marked as a job transfer or restrictied case (Column I) and zero days of job transfer and restriction were recorded (Column L), as determined on January 31, 2013.     ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $850

View Cabell Huntington Hospital, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338597040.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.