Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DAUBER COMPANY, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DAUBER COMPANY, INC. in 577 N 18TH RD., TONICA, IL 61370 (NAICS 327999). OSHA activity number 338697451.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Dauber Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dauber Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
577 N 18TH RD.
City
TONICA
State
IL
ZIP
61370
Mailing
577 N 18TH RD., TONICA, IL 61370
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327999
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.24 H

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2013
Abate by
May 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,320 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.24(h): Standard railings were not provided on the open sides of all exposed stairways and stair platforms:     (a) The stairway from the main floor to the upstairs parts room did not have an intermediate rail between the top rail and stair tread surface on the open side.     There is no abatement documentation or certification required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1320

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2013
Abate by
May 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energization, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    (a) The employer did not have an established lockout/tagout program for employees who performed servicing and maintenance on machines and equipment such as but not limited to conveyors, pumps, mixers and block machine.   Abatement Note:  A lockout/tagout program should include the following key elements:   - Energy source evaluation  - Development, documentation and utilization of machine-specific procedures  - Procedures for group lockout (when more than one employee is servicing the same equipment at the same time)  - Training for "authorized," "affected," and "other"employees  - Periodic inspections (at least annual)  - Sharing of lockout/tagout program information with outside contractors   There is no abatement documentation or certification required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $2200

1910.178 A04

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2013
Abate by
Jun 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,760 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:     (a) Employees drove Caterpillar and Toyota powered industrial trucks with unrated and unapproved attachments for lifting 2,000 lb. bags of silicon carbide material. The employer did not obtain written approval from the vehicle manufacturers prior to allowing employees to operate the vehicles with attachments.     Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1760

1910.178 A05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2013
Abate by
Jun 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered:    (a) Employees drove Caterpillar and Toyota powered industrial trucks with unrated and unapproved attachments for lifting 2,000 lb. bags of silicon carbide material.  The lift trucks did not have labels reflecting the weight and capacity of the vehicles and attachments combined.    Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.334 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2013
Abate by
Jul 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1910.334(c)(1): Unqualified persons performed testing work on electric circuits or equipment.     (a) Employees who performed voltage measurements on energized components up to 480v on machines and equipment such as, but not limited to conveyors and loader/unloaders were not qualified to perform testing work on electric circuits or equipment.     Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(c).     Abatement note:  Qualified persons shall be capable of working safely on energized circuits and shall be familiar with the proper use of special precautionary techniques, personal protective equipment (PPE), insulating and shielding materials and insulated tools (see 1910.333(c)(2)).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $2200

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2013
Abate by
Jun 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i):  Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:     Maintenance employees who performed voltage measurements on energized components up to 480v while servicing and repairing equipment did not wear appropriate electrical protective equipment, including but not limited to the following, to protect against electrical shock and arc flash/blast injuries:     a)     Rubber insulating gloves with leather protectors.   b)     Arc-rated clothing such as arc-rated long-sleeve shirt and pants or arc-rated coverall   c)     Arc-rated flash suit hood or balaclava   d)     Hearing protection (canal inserts)     Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(c).     Abatement Note:  For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition, www.NFPA.org.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $2200

1910.335 A01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2013
Abate by
Jun 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(iv): Employees exposed to the danger of head injury from electric shock or burns due to contact with exposed energized parts did not wear nonconductive head protection:   (a) Employees who performed voltage measurements on energized components up to 480v did not wear nonconductive head protection, such as hard hats with die-electric properties, to protect against electrical shock and arc flash/blast injuries.   Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(c).  Abatement Note:  For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition, www.NFPA.org.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.335 A01 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2013
Abate by
Jun 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(v): Employees exposed to the danger of injury to the eyes or face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying objects resulting from electrical explosion did not wear protective equipment for the eyes or face:  (a) Employees performed voltage measurements on energized components up to 480v.  An arc-rated face shield was not worn (in addition to safety glasses/goggles) to protect the eyes and face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying debris.  Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(c).  Abatement note:  For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition, www.NFPA.org.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 B05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2013
Abate by
May 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(b)(5): The rated load of crane(s) was not plainly marked on each side of the crane:  (a) Block Machine Area.  Employees used a one ton crane/hoist where the load rating was marked on the hoist, but not on each side of the crane.  There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.179 J02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2013
Abate by
May 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): Monthly inspections of hooks, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, were not performed:   (a) Block Machine Area. The employer did not complete certification records of the monthly inspections of the hoist hooks for deformations or cracks.  There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.179 J02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2013
Abate by
May 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed:  (a) Block Machine Area.  The employer did not complete certification records of the monthly inspections of the hoist chains, including end connections, for excessive wear, twist, distorted links or stretch.   There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Dauber Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338697451.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.