Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: BERRY PLASTICS CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BERRY PLASTICS CORPORATION in 311 W. MONROE ST., MONROEVILLE, OH 44847 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 338789035.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Berry Plastics Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Berry Plastics Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
311 W. MONROE ST.
City
MONROEVILLE
State
OH
ZIP
44847
Mailing
311 WEST MONROE ST., MONROEVILLE, OH 44847
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
337
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Apr 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $6,000
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall and struck-by hazards:    a) Berry Plastics Corporation - Monroeville, Ohio: On or about September 15, 2012, the employer provided anchorage points for personal fall arrest systems on the bridges of the gantry cranes that allowed for unwanted hazardous movement.  Employees working from the elevated surfaces, such as molding machines, were exposed to injury from being pulled off the equipment in the event of unwanted crane movement.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $6000
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.24 B

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Apr 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.24(b): Fixed stairs were not provided for access from one structure level to another where operations necessitated regular travel between levels, and for access to operating platforms at any equipment which requires attention routinely during operations:    a) Berry Plastics Corporation - Monroeville, Ohio: On or about February 8, 2013, the employer did not assure that fixed stairs were provided and/or used for employee access to the top of Press/Line #12.  Employees performing regular machine maintenance used various machine parts to access the top of the machine.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.212 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Mar 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a) Berry Plastics Corporation - Monroeville, Ohio: On or about February 19, 2012, the employer did not assure that the LP002 printing machine was adequately guarded to protect employees from pinch points and rotating parts hazards.      In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $5000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Nov 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:    a) Berry Plastics Corporation - Monroeville, Ohio: On or about February 15, 2013, the employer did not assure an employee troubleshooting and voltage testing electrical energy on a grinder located in the molding room was provided with and used protective equipment for the body.  The employee was exposed to 480 volts while performing the electrical tests.     b) Berry Plastics Corporation - Monroeville, Ohio: On or about February 19, 2013, the employer did not assure an employee troubleshooting and voltage testing electrical energy of a grinder located at Line 6 was provided with and used protective equipment for the body.  The employee was exposed to 480 volts while performing the electrical tests.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $5000
  • · C (S) $5000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.335 A01 V

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Mar 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(v): Employees were not provided with or did not wear protective equipment for the eyes or face wherever there is danger of injury to the eyes or face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying objects resulting from electrical explosion.    a) Berry Plastics Corporation - Monroeville, Ohio: On or about February 15, 2013, the employer did not assure an employee troubleshooting and voltage testing electrical energy on a grinder located in the molding room was provided with and used protective equipment for the face.  The employee was exposed to 480 volts while performing the electrical tests.     b) Berry Plastics Corporation - Monroeville, Ohio: On or about February 19, 2013, the employer did not assure an employee troubleshooting and voltage testing electrical energy of a grinder located at Line 6 was provided with and used protective equipment for the face.  The employee was exposed to 480 volts while performing the electrical tests.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Nov 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $35,000 · Current $35,000
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    a) Berry Plastics Corporation - Monroeville, Ohio: On or about September 15, 2012, the employer failed to develop and utilize energy control procedures that would protect employees from hazardous energy sources of Line #12.  Employees performing servicing tasks such as, but not limited to, regular maintenance and cleaning were exposed to moving components of the CBW Automation equipment associated with Line #12.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.    Berry Plastics Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i), which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 313964199, citation number 1,  item number 13a and was affirmed as a final order on December 9, 2010, with respect to a workplace located at 3565 Chadwick Dr. in Dunkirk, NY.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (R) $35000
  • · C (R) $35000
  • · Z (R) $35000

1910.147 C06 I

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2013
Abate by
Mar 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $35,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    a) Berry Plastics Corporation - Monroeville, Ohio: On or about, the employer failed to conduct periodic inspections of the company's lockout procedures to assure that proper lockout/tagout procedures and requirements were being followed during maintenance activities on Line #12.      In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.    Berry Plastics Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i), which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 109081, citation number 1,  item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on February 24, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 5750 W. 118th St. in Alsip, IL.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (R) $0
  • · C (R) $35000
  • · Z (R) $35000

View Berry Plastics Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338789035.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.