SAIPAN, MP —
OSHA Inspection: LANDMARK LTD.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LANDMARK LTD. in KANG'S CORPORATION NEW SWIMMING POOL AND CONCRETE PARKING LOT PROJECT PALE ARNOLD ROAD AND NEW QUARTER MASTER ROAD, VILLAGE OF GUALO RAI, SAIPAN, MP 96950 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 338846439.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LANDMARK LTD.
- Site address
- KANG'S CORPORATION NEW SWIMMING POOL AND CONCRETE PARKING LOT PROJECT PALE ARNOLD ROAD AND NEW QUARTER MASTER ROAD, VILLAGE OF GUALO RAI
- City
- SAIPAN
- State
- MP
- ZIP
- 96950
- Mailing
- PO BOX 7944 SVRB, SAIPAN, MP 96950
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238110
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $867 · Current $867
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent and continuous: (a) In the maintenance house on or about February 14, 2013, there was no grounding on the outlet that supplied power to a sump pump in the pool. The sump pump was used to pump water out of the pool. Employees were in the pool to chip excess concrete off the pool's sides.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $867
1926.51 F01
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.51(f)(1): The employer did not provide adequate washing facilities for employees engaged in the application of paints, coating, herbicides, or insecticides, or in other operations where contaminants may be harmful to the employees. Such facilities were not in near proximity to the worksite and were not so equipped as to enable employees to remove such substances: (a) At the project on or about February 14, 2013, and at times prior thereto, adequate washing facilities were not provided for employees that mixed, poured and applied portland cement for a parking lot and swimming pool A hose, connected to an exterior spigot, supplied water to wash. Soap was not provided or available onsite. Towels or other drying methods were not provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.95 A
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact: (a) At the bottom of the swimming pool on or about February 14, 2013, instead of wearing shoes with safety toes, employees wore open toed sandals. Employees carried hammers and other tools to chip concrete off the pool's sides.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder: (a) At the south end of the swimming pool on or about February 14, 2013, a 4.5 foot long extension ladder did not extend at least three feet above the landing level and was not secured at its top. There were no devices to grasp onto. Employees used the ladder to access the pool deck level. They were in the pool to chip excess concrete off the pool's sides.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Landmark LTD.
View Landmark LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238110)
More inspections in MP
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338846439.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.