Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: METO LIFT INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of METO LIFT INC in 556 COMMERCE ST, FRANKLIN LAKES, NJ 07417 (NAICS 333249). OSHA activity number 338884646.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Meto Lift INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Meto Lift INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
METO LIFT INC
Site address
556 COMMERCE ST
City
FRANKLIN LAKES
State
NJ
ZIP
07417
Mailing
556 COMMERCE ST, FRANKLIN LAKES, NJ 07417
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333249
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a fall hazard while using a platform that was elevated on the forks of a powered industrial truck.       a. Facility: An employee was exposed to a fall hazard while using a platform that was elevated on the forks of a Linde powered industrial truck, on or about 2/18/2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:     a. Machine Shop:  An employee was exposed to a struck by hazard from the unguarded rotating spindle on a Dashin Prince lathe, on or about 2/6/2013.     b. Machine Shop:  An employee was exposed to an amputation hazard from the unguarded drill bit on Supermill-H drill press, on or about 2/6/2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(b):     Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:    a. Machine Shop: An Atlas and Yuasa drill press were not  anchored to prevent moving, on or about 2/6/2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i):     Horizontal belts which had both runs seven feet or less from the floor level were not guarded with a guard that extended to at least fifteen inches above the belt:(29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i):     a. Machine Shop: The horizontal belts on the Atlas and Supermill-H drill press were not guarded, on or about 2/6/2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.303 G01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii):     The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage:(    a. Welding Department. The area in front of the electrical panels in the welding area was used for the storage of materials, on or about 2/6/2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.305 G01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iii):     Flexible cords and cables were used for purposes prohibited by subparagraphs (A) through (E) of this paragraph.    a. Polishing and Grinding Department. The flexible electrical cords were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure, on or about 2/6/2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.334 A02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i):     Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):     a. Polishing and Grinding Department: A ground pin was missing on a Flexible Shaft machine (#5760), on or about 2/6/2013.     b. Facility: The Linde powered industrial truck electrical battery cord with exposed copper wiring was not removed from service, on or about 2/6/2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.178 L01 I

Willful 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $28,000 · Current $10,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):     a. Facility: The employer did not provide training for employees operating a Linde powered industrial truck, on or about 2/6/2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (W) $10000
  • — Z (W) $28000

View Meto Lift INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338884646.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.