ANNISTON, AL ·
OSHA Inspection: MULTIMETCO, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MULTIMETCO, INC. in 1610 FRANK AKERS ROAD, ANNISTON, AL 36207 (NAICS 331410). OSHA activity number 338891831.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MULTIMETCO, INC.
- Site address
- 1610 FRANK AKERS ROAD
- City
- ANNISTON
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36207
- Mailing
- 1610 FRANK AKERS ROAD, ANNISTON, AL 36207
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331410
- Employees
- 80
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1025 C01
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period: a) On or about 3/13/13 - Fire assay room, a fire assay quality control technician performing flux and melt operations was exposed to a lead dust and fume concentration of 58 micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour time period. Air sampling was conducted on 3/13/13 for 469 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 11 minutes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1428
- · Z (S) $2380
1910.1025 E01 I
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i): For any employees exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit for more than 30 days per year the employer did not implement engineering and work practice controls (including administrative controls) were not effectively implemented to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead: a) On or about 3/13/13 - Fire assay room, a fire assay quality control technician performing flux and melt operations was exposed to a lead dust and fume concentration of 58 micrograms per cubic meter averaged over an eight-hour period. Engineering controls in place did not reduce employee exposure below the permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter. Air sampling was conducted on 3/13/13 for 469 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 11 minutes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1025 G01
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(g)(1): Appropriate protective work clothing and equipment were not provided at no cost to the employee when employee(s) were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, or where the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists: a) On or about 3/13/13 - Fire assay room, a fire assay quality control technician performing flux and melt operations was exposed to a lead dust and fume concentration of 58 micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour time period. Sampling was conducted on 3/13/13 for 469 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 11 minutes. Appropriate protective work clothing, such as coveralls or similar full-body work clothing and disposable shoe coverlets was not provided to the employee.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1428
- · Z (S) $2380
1910.1025 I03 I
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(i): Employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, were not required to shower at the end of the work shift: a) On or about 3/13/13 - Fire assay room, a fire assay room quality control technician performing flux and melt operations was exposed to a lead dust and fume concentration of 58 micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour time period. Sampling was conducted on 3/13/13 for 469 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 11 minutes. The employee was not required to shower at the end of the shift.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1428
- · Z (S) $2380
1910.1025 I04 IV
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(4)(iv): Employees entering lunchroom facilities with protective work clothing or equipment were not required to remove surface lead dust by vacuuming, downdraft booth, or other cleaning method(s): a) On or about 3/13/13 - Lunch room, a fire assay room quality control technician performing flux and melt operations was exposed to a lead dust and fume concentration above the permissible exposure limit and was not required to remove surface lead dust by vacuuming, downdraft booth or other cleaning methods before entering lunchroom facilities.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
91309135
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: a) On or about 2/14/13 - Cutting area, employees exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (Respirable Fraction) were allowed to have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face. An employee was exposed to 0.22 milligrams per cubic meter of nuisance dust (respirable fraction). Air sampling was done on 3/6/13 for 351 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the remainder of the shift (129 minutes). b) On or about 2/14/13 - Cutting area, employees exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (Total Dust) were allowed to have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face. An employee was exposed to 1.3 milligrams per cubic meter of nuisance dust. Air sampling was conducted on 3/12/13 for 489 minutes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1025 H01
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $595 · Current $357 Reduced
1591BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: a) On or about 2/22/13 - QC building, the concrete floor threshold of the fire assay room had lead present. b) On or about 2/22/13 - QC Building, the 6" x 6" ceramic tile/grout floor of the bathroom threshold had lead present. c) On or about 2/22/13 - QC Building, the plastic top of the microwave in the employee break room had lead present. d) On or about 2/22/13 - QC Building, the interior glass of the microwave in the employee break room had lead present.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $357
- · Z (O) $595
1910.1025 M02 I
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(2)(i): The employer did not post the following warning signs in each work area where the PEL was exceeded: DANGER LEAD MAY DAMAGE FERTILITY OR THE UNBORN CHILD CAUSES DAMAGE TO THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DO NOT EAT, DRINK OR SMOKE IN THIS AREA a) On or about 3/13/13 - Fire assay room, a fire assay quality control technician performing flux and melt operations was exposed to a lead dust and fume concentration of 58 micrograms per cubic meter averaged over an eight-hour period. Lead warning sign(s) were not posted in the fire assay room. Air sampling was conducted on 3/13/13 for 469 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 11 minutes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Multimetco, INC.
View Multimetco, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331410)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338891831.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.