EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL —
OSHA Inspection: H & M BACKHOE SERVICE, INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of H & M BACKHOE SERVICE, INC in WOESTBOUL STREET & CASTEN STREET, EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL 62205 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 338937592.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- H & M BACKHOE SERVICE, INC
- Site address
- WOESTBOUL STREET & CASTEN STREET
- City
- EAST SAINT LOUIS
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62205
- Mailing
- 1522 MORGAN STREET, SWANSEA, IL 62226
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237110
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a) For Citation 1, Item 2a issued on 4/26/2013 with an abatement date of 5/22/2013, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. b) For Citation 1, Item 2b issued on 4/26/2013 with an abatement date of 5/22/2013, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. a) For Citation 1, Item 1 issued on 4/26/2013 with an abatement date of 5/2/2013, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. b) For Citation 1, Item 3 issued on 4/26/2013 with an abatement date of 5/2/2013, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. c) For Citation 1, Item 4 issued on 4/26/2013 with an abatement date of 5/2/2013, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: An employee was exposed to a fall from an elevated hydraulic excavator bucket while working from a excavation located at intersection of Woestboul Street & Casten, East Saint Louis, IL, when the employees was elevated in the bucket of a Caterpillar 328d Excavator for the purpose of accessing and egressing the employee from a 12 foot deep excavation Abatement Note: Among others, one feasible means of abatement would be to use a ladder to access and egress from the excavation and to follow "The American Equipment Manufactures Safety manual for hydraulic excavators which states "Never use a bucket for a work platform or personnel carrier."
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: An employee working in an approximately 10 foot 8 inch deep excavation was not provided a ladder or other safe means to access and egress from the excavation , and was not provided cave-in protection. The employer did not instruct employees to control and eliminate the hazards present at the jobsite in accordance with the OSHA regulations.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.651 K01
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): An inspection of the excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems was not conducted by the competent person prior to the start of work and as needed throughout the shift: Two employees working in a 10 foot 8 inch deep excavation were not provided a ladder or other safe means to access and egress from the trench, and were not provided cave-in protection. The employer did not have a competent person inspect the excavation prior to the start of the work to control and eliminate the hazards present at the jobsite in accordance with the OSHA regulations.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.651 C02
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees: An employees working in a 10 foot 8 inch deep excavation was not provided a ladder or other safe means to access and egress from the trench.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Apr 26, 2013
- Abate by
- May 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652(c). The employer had not complied with the provisions of 29 CFR 1926.652(b)(1)(i) in that the excavation was sloped at an angle steeper than one and one-half horizontal to one vertical (34 degrees measured from the horizontal): An employee was working in an approximately 30 foot long by 18 foot wide and 10 foot 8 inch deep excavation which the north wall of the excavation was approximately sloped at 80 degrees which was greater than the required 45 degrees and the exposed employees were not protected by an adequate protective system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at H & M Backhoe Service, INC
View H & M Backhoe Service, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237110)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338937592.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.