Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: CASA RESIDENTIAL, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CASA RESIDENTIAL, LLC in 59 WATERVILLE ROAD, AVON, CT 06001 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 338946981.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Casa Residential, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Casa Residential, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
59 WATERVILLE ROAD
City
AVON
State
CT
ZIP
06001
Mailing
533 MAIN STREET, SOUTHINGTON, CT 06489
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.453 B02 VI

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(vi):  Boom and basket load limits specified by the manufacturer were exceeded:    a)  Job Site:  59 Waterville Road, Avon, CT. - On or about 3-11-13 - Three (3) employees were observed being lifted and working from a Genie 4WD Boom Lift.  Rated capacity for the lift is 500 lbs.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):  Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    a) Job Site:  59 Waterville Road, Avon, CT. - On or about 3-11-13 - Employee was observed working in the tower structure 25 feet above the ground with no fall protection system ibeing used.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii):   Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:    a)  Job Site: 59 Waterville Road, Avon, CT. - On or about 3-11-13 - Employees were observed working in a 4WD Genie Boom lift not wearing proper personal fall protection systems which exposed them to fall hazards of 15 to 20 feet to wooden beam and flooring surfaces below.  Fall system in use consisted of a 6 foot shock absorbing lanyard attached with a rope grab device to a 6 foot lenght of lifeline wrapped around the railing system of the lift.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A02 II

Serious Gravity 5 33 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(ii):  The employer did not assure that each employee, as necessary, had been trained by a competent person in the correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used:    a)  Job Site:  Watervill Road, Avon, CT. - On or about 3-11-13 -  Employees were observed working in an aerial lift using fall protection systems that were designed to be used on a roof installation.  6 foot lanyard with shock absorbing system with rope grab lanyard and lifeline wrapped around the railing of the aerial lift.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

View Casa Residential, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338946981.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.