Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALCATRAZ CRUISES

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ALCATRAZ CRUISES in VESSEL ALCATRAZ FLYER RICHMOND DRY-DOCK, RICHMOND, CA 94804 (NAICS 336611). OSHA activity number 338955966.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alcatraz Cruises — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alcatraz Cruises is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALCATRAZ CRUISES
Site address
VESSEL ALCATRAZ FLYER RICHMOND DRY-DOCK
City
RICHMOND
State
CA
ZIP
94804
Mailing
MARGARET FOSTER 55 FRANCISCO ST SUITE 360, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336611
Employees
150
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2013
Abate by
May 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c):  The employer did not implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: (29 CFR 1915.154)       Onboard the vessel ALCATRAZ FLYER, main deck:  Employees were using 3M 6100 dual cartridge respirators during painting operations and the employer had not implemented a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2013
Abate by
May 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:     Onboard the vessel ALCATRAZ FLYER, main deck:  Employees were using 3M 6100 dual cartridge respirators during grinding and painting operations and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2013
Abate by
May 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f): The employee was required to use a respirator without being fit tested with the same make, model, style and size of respirator that was to be used: (29 CFR 1915.154)     Onboard the vessel ALCATRAZ FLYER, main deck:  Employees were using 3M 6100 dual cartridge respirators during painting operations and the employer had not ensured they were fit tested prior to using the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2013
Abate by
May 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k):  The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary (29 CFR 1915.154)       Onboard the vessel ALCATRAZ FLYER, main deck:  Employees were using 3M 6100 dual cartridge respirators during painting operations and the employer had not provided training in the proper use of respirators annually or more often if necessary.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1915.72 A03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2013
Abate by
Apr 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.72(a)(3):  Portable ladders were not lashed, blocked, or otherwise secured to prevent their displacement:      Paint float, starboard side, near the bow of vessel ALCATRAZ FLYER:  A model maker was exposed to a fall of ten feet while using a portable ladder to access the vessel.  The ladder was not lashed, blocked or otherwise secured to prevent displacement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $7000

1915.152 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2013
Abate by
Apr 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.152(a): The employer did not provide or ensure each affected employee with the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for the eyes, face, head, extremities, torso, and respiratory system, including protective clothing, protective barriers, personal fall protection equipment, and lifesaving equipment, meeting the applicable provisions of Subpart I, wherever employees were exposed to work activity hazards that required the use of PPE.       Onboard vessel ALCATRAZ, starboard side main deck pedestal:  An electrician was not provided personal fall protection and was exposed to a fall of approximately sixteen feet into the water while pulling electrical cable while positioned on a deck pedestal.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $7000

1915.158 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2013
Abate by
Apr 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1915.158(b)(2):  On floating vessels under 200 feet (61 m) in length, at least one 30-inch (0.76 m) U.S. Coast Guard approved ring life buoy with line attached was not  located at the gangway.       Vessel ALCATRAZ FLYER, portside, gangway:  At least one 30-inch (0.76 m) U.S. Coast Guard approved ring life buoy with line attached was not located at the gangway.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1915.502 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 28, 2013
Abate by
May 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1915.502(a):  A written fire safety plan was not been developed and implemented by the employer that covered all of the actions necessary to ensure the employees safety in the event of a fire.       Onboard vessel ALCATRAZ FLYER: Employees were working onboard the vessel and the employer had not developed or implemented a fire safety plan that covered all of the actions necessary to ensure the employees safety in the event of a fire.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Alcatraz Cruises's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338955966.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.