Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: VEOLIA WATER NORTH AMERICA OPERATING SERVICES, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of VEOLIA WATER NORTH AMERICA OPERATING SERVICES, LLC in 140 PETTACONSETT AVENUE, CRANSTON, RI 02920 (NAICS 562219). OSHA activity number 338958705.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Veolia Water North America Operating Services, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Veolia Water North America Operating Services, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
140 PETTACONSETT AVENUE
City
CRANSTON
State
RI
ZIP
02920
Mailing
140 PETTACONSETT AVENUE, CRANSTON, RI 02920
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562219
Employees
42
Ownership type
Private (A)

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 42 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2013
Abate by
Dec 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form:    Worksites including the Solids Handling Building:  On or about 3/13/13 the employer had not provided reasonable estimates of employee exposures to respiratory hazards including, but not limited to respirable dust exposures when maintaining incineration and ash handling operations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1000
  • · Z (S) $3400

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 42 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2013
Abate by
Oct 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) was used:    Worksite:  Employees were provided with N-95 Particulate Respirators without being fit tested prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2013
Abate by
Oct 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  Workplace:  Several employees with facial hair did not remove facial hair prior to use of N-95 dust mask type respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2013
Abate by
Oct 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    The Underground Utility Gallery between the Solids Handling Building and the Blower Building:  On or about 4/2/13 the employer had not provided suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body when the lime slurry conveyance lines are serviced.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1000
  • · Z (S) $3400

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2013
Abate by
Sep 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a.   Maintenance Shop:  The unused portion of the Dayton belt and disc sander was not adequately guarded exposing employees to the rotating parts.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $2550

1910.304 G05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2013
Abate by
Sep 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective:     a.  Solids Handling Building, first floor near incinerator: The Dayton floor fan was not grounded in that its ground pin was missing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1000
  • · Z (S) $3400

1910.305 G01 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2013
Abate by
Sep 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv): Flexible cords and/ or cables were used for purposes prohibited by paragraphs (A) through (F) of 29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(a):    a.  Maintenance Shop, Basement:  Temporary wiring powering a sump pump was used in lieu of permanent wiring.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.37 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2013
Abate by
Sep 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":  Control Room, Solids Handling Building:  The exterior exit was not provided with an "EXIT" sign.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.95 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 42 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2013
Abate by
Dec 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:  Solids Handling Building: On or about 4/2/13 the employer had not monitored employee noise exposure for employees working adjacent to the sludge and ash processing equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.120 Q01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2013
Abate by
Dec 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(1): The employer did not develop and implement an emergency response plan to handle anticipated emergencies prior to commencement of emergency response operations:  Dechlorination Building: On or about 3/13/13 the employers emergency action plan had not been updated to reflect the current practice of evacuation with no emergency response into the facility when alarms sound.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.147 C04 II

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2013
Abate by
Oct 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to items of this section:  a.  Establishment:  The employer's energy control procedure did not specifically state the techniques to be used to lock or tag out each type of machine.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Veolia Water North America Operating Services, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 338958705.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.