CHESTER, CT —
OSHA Inspection: C & R CONSTRUCTION
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of C & R CONSTRUCTION in 20 MAPLE STREET, CHESTER, CT 06412 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 338962285.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- C & R CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 20 MAPLE STREET
- City
- CHESTER
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06412
- Mailing
- 258 MAIN STREET, DEEP RIVER, CT 06417
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B05 II
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- May 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilivered end. Jobsite: the 24 foot platform that the employees were working from extended over the support approximately 36 inches and was not secured and or guardrails provided to prevent the employees from causing the cantilevered section to tip.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- May 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: Jobsite: The supporting poles of the pump jack scaffold were not bearing on base plates, mudsills or other adequate firm foundation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- May 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. Jobsite: The pump jack scaffold that employees were working from was not braced or secured at the bottom of the scaffold poles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- May 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Jobsite: The employees who were working from the pump jack scaffold platform at heights of approximately 16 feet above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- May 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: The employee who were working on the roof was not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 7, 2013
- Abate by
- May 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: Jobsite: A.) The extension ladder that was used to gain access to the roof did not have its side rails extended 3 feet above the landing surface. B.) The extension ladder that was used to gain access to the pump jack scaffold did not have its side rails extended 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections at C & R Construction
View C & R Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338962285.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.