Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,473Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-28 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BUREAU OF RECLAMATION in GRAND COULEE DAM, GRAND COULEE, WA 99133 (NAICS 221111). OSHA activity number 338975337.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bureau of Reclamation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bureau of Reclamation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
GRAND COULEE DAM
City
GRAND COULEE
State
WA
ZIP
99133
Mailing
P.O. BOX 620, GRAND COULEE, WA 99133
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
221111
Employees
419
Ownership type
D

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace:   a)  The Right Power House - The employer did not quantitatively evaluate the atmosphere for oxygen deficiency and carbon monoxide concentrations prior to requiring employees to enter the facility, nor did the employer require the use of air supplied respirators or self-contained breathing apparatus:  1.  Right Power House on March 9, 2013, where the employer did not require the use of respiratory protection as employees performed tasks such as, but not limited to, assessment of fire damage and development of sampling strategies.     2. Right Power House on March 9, 2013, where the employer required employees to wear North 7700 half-face negative pressure respirators during tasks such as, but not limited to, collection of wipe samples and placement of air monitoring pumps.  3. March 10, 2013, Office Tower - The employer did not quantitatively evaluate the atmosphere for oxygen deficiency and carbon monoxide concentrations prior to requiring employees to enter the Office Tower.  The employer evaluated and selected proper personal protective equipment for employee's exposure to particulate and asbestos fiber hazards.  The employees were performing housekeeping tasks such as, but not limited to, vacuuming and washing surfaces.     NOTE: The evaluation shall include a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazard(s) and an identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form. Where the employer cannot identify or reasonably estimate the employee exposure, the employer shall consider the atmosphere to be IDLH.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested:     a) Right Power House and Office Tower, the employer did not provide annual fit-tests to employee(s) required to wear respirators such as, but not limited to, 3M half-face negative pressure respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Bureau of Reclamation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338975337.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.