Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NEBRASKA COLD STORAGE, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NEBRASKA COLD STORAGE, INC. in 600 EAST 39TH STREET, HASTINGS, NE 68901 (NAICS 493120). OSHA activity number 338975725.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nebraska Cold Storage, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nebraska Cold Storage, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
600 EAST 39TH STREET
City
HASTINGS
State
NE
ZIP
68901
Mailing
600 EAST 39TH STREET, HASTINGS, NE 68901
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493120
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

15 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 I B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B):     Process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include accurate Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&ID):     Throughout the Facility:  The Piping and Instrumentation Diagram developed for the system did not include all of the components of the system.  Safety Relief Valves (SRV) located on the system compressors vent to a header system which then vents to the roof.  The P&ID shows that each SRV vents directly to atmosphere omitting the header systems.       Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of the abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.119 E07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(7):     Employers shall retain process hazards analyses and updates or revalidations for each process covered by this section, as well as the documented resolution of recommendations described in paragraph (e)(5) of this section for the life of the process.    Worksite located at 600 E. 39th Street, Hastings, NE; Throughout the facility:  The employer failed to maintain the original Process Hazard Analysis for the facility.  It was conducted in l999.  This would include the findings, recommendations, and resolutions.        Abatement certification is required for this violation. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed for the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.119 N

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1910.119(n):     The employer did not implement an emergency plan for the entire plant in accordance with the provisions of 29 CFR 1910.38:    Work site located at 600 E. 39th Street, Hastings, NE; throughout the company.:  The employer has not developed exit routes for the employees to follow in the event of an evacuation.  The facility uses ammonia as part of their refrigeration system and a release could harm any employee that does not evacuate to a safe, predetermined area.  The evacuation plan should include a method for determining the safe route and rally point utilizing a wind sock to determine the safe upwind predetermined evacuation location.      Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Nov 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i):     The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:    Worksite located at 600 E. 39th Street, Hastings, NE; throughout the facility.:  The employer failed to ensure that any employee involved or affected by lockout/tag out operations had received the level of training necessary to ensure the safe application, usage and removal of energy control devices.     Abatement certification is required for this violation.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.176 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Nov 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1910.176(b):   Storage of Material created a hazard (based on improper installation and use).       Work Site located at 600 E. 39th Street, Hastings, NE; cold storage warehouses:  The storage racks within the cold storage warehouses have sustained damage that change the strength and stability of the system as intended by the manufacturer.        Abatement certification is required for this violation. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed for the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L04 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Oct 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii):   An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:   Worksite located at 600 E. 39th Street, Hastings, NE; Throughout the Facility:  The employer failed to ensure that each operator of a powered industrial truck was evaluated every three years as required.  An employee has not had a re-evaluation since 2000.     Abatement certification is required for this violation.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.303 G01 I B

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Oct 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(B):   For electric equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, and likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized, the width of the working space in front of electrical equipment was less than the width of the equipment or 762 mm (30 inches), whichever was greater:  Worksite located at 600 E. 39th Street, Hastings, NE; Fork Truck Charging Area:  An electrical disconnect (circuit breaker panel) did not have the necessary clear space as identified in 1910.303(g)(1).  In this case, the clear space should have been at 30 inches and was limited to 25 inches.    Abatement certification is required for this violation.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.305 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Nov 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.305(e)(1):     Cabinets, cutout boxes, fittings, boxes, and panelboard enclosures in damp or wet locations were not installed to prevent moisture or water from entering and accumulating within the enclosures:    Work Site located at 600 E. 39th Street, Hastings, NE; Engine Room:  Electrical components such as junction boxes and conduit are not designed for exposure to wet or damp locations.  In this case, the components are part of the circuits related to an anhydrous ammonia refrigeration system and have become encased in ice (wet location).          Abatement certification is required for this violation. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed for the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.305 G01 IV A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Nov 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A):     Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:    Work site located at 600 E. 39th Street, Hastings, NE; Engine Room:  An extension cord was plugged into an outlet and then run over the top of an overhead door to power a water filtration unit (de-ionizer) used to refill fork truck batteries.  The cord had been in place for over 1 year which is beyond temporary use.    Abatement certification is required for this violation.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Nov 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii):     Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided that will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.    Work Site located at 600 E. 39th Street, Hastings, NE; Loading Dock:  An Exide fork truck battery charger has a cord which has come away from the plug creating an issue of strain relief.  This allowed all of the weight of the cord to be transmitted to the terminal screws which can create resistance issues.        Abatement certification is required for this violation. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed for the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.119 F01 III B

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $28,000 · Current $12,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(B):     The employer has failed to develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for taking the precautions necessary to prevent exposure; including engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment:    Work site located at 600 E. 39th Street, Hastings, NE; Throughout the Facility: The employer failed to develop and implement procedures and controls putting into place the precautions necessary to prevent employees from exposure to anhydrous ammonia.  The company has not adequately addressed how employees are protected or how they would be protected, e.g., engineering control, PPE, or some other method,  in the event of an upset condition.       Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $12300
  • — Z (W) $28000

1910.119 F01 III C

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(C):     The employer has failed to develop and implement an operating procedure discussing the control measures to be taken if physical contact or airborne exposure occurs.       Work site located at 600 E. 39th Street, Hastings, NE; Throughout the Facility: The employer did not develop an operating procedure that discusses what actions will be taken in the event of an exposure to anhydrous ammonia.  The employer has failed to develop a procedure for response actions for employee exposure that would include but is not limited to event escalation, emergency response, or containment.        Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $0
  • — Z (W) $0

1910.119 J02

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $28,000 · Current $12,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2):     The employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment:    Throughout the Facility:  The employer has not developed any procedures for ensuring the mechanical integrity of the system.  This would include a program outlining preventative maintenance, component replacement, and/or repair.  One such example would be a valve replacement procedure to include a change out schedule for safety relieve valves.  During the inspection it was also found that the company did not have a piping inspection procedure.  Rusted piping was found in a number of locations that had not been mitigated.       Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of the abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $12300
  • — Z (W) $28000

1910.119 J05

Repeat Gravity 10 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $28,000 · Current $12,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5):     The employer did not correct deficiencies in equipment that were outside acceptable limits (defined by the process safety information on paragraph (d) of this section) before furhter use or in a safe and timely manner when necessary means where taken to assure safe operation:    Work site located at 600 E. 39th Street, Hastings, NE; Engine Room:  The following deficiencies at the site were not corrected:    a)  The employer did not ensure that safety relief valves installed in the ammonia refrigeration system to prevent over-pressurization conditions were changed within the timeframes established by the manufacturer.  The valves are to be changed at least every 5 years or in the event of a release.  Two valves, 804 A&B, in the engine room were 1 year past due.    b)  Rusted piping, damaged insulation and ice buildup in the engine room had not been addressed since originally being identified in 2009.  These three items are all related to the ammonia refrigeration process piping and associated components.  One instance of icing had encapsulated an ammonia pump and motor to the point where the items were not identifiable.    c)  Engine room ventilation motors are not of the explosion proof variety.  Due to the flammable nature of anhydrous ammonia, ventilation system that are designed to evacuate any leaked material shall not present an ignition source for the listed highly hazardous chemical.  This item was identified in 2009.        d)  Engine Room intake vents are not of the fail open variety.  In the event the intake vents fail, the required continuous ventilation for the room would be disrupted.  This item was identified in 2009.        Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $12300
  • — Z (W) $28000

1910.119 O04

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $28,000 · Current $12,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(o)(4):     The employer did not promptly determine and document an appropriate response to each of the findings of the compliance audit, and document that deficiencies have been corrected.      Work site located at 600 E. 39th Street, Hastings, NE; Throughout the Company:  The employer failed to develop a system to track any identified deficiencies noted during he Process Safety Management Audit.  There were twenty-two items identified in the 2010 audit and no method to track those open items until they were corrected.  As of the inspection date, there were still 12 open items from the audit.       Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $12300
  • — Z (W) $28000

View Nebraska Cold Storage, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338975725.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.