SPRINGFIELD, IL —
OSHA Inspection: BAYMONT INN & SUITES
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BAYMONT INN & SUITES in 5817 S. 6TH ST. RD., SPRINGFIELD, IL 62703 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 338983067.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BAYMONT INN & SUITES
- Site address
- 5817 S. 6TH ST. RD.
- City
- SPRINGFIELD
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62703
- Mailing
- 5817 S. 6TH ST. RD., SPRINGFIELD, IL 62703
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 721110
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- May 15, 2013
- Abate by
- May 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards: An employee assisting with the maintenance of the Motel sign from the roof was exposed to a fall hazard because no fall protection was being utilized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- May 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): An employee was exposed to a fall hazard when working on a roof, and the employer had not conducted a person protective equipment hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1120
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: The employer did not develop and document a personal protective equipment hazard assessment. The written certification did not include the name of the person who certified that the evaluation had been performed, and the date that the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.29 A
- Issued
- May 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $280 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent. On or about March 29, 2013, the employer did not complete a OSHA 300 form for recording injuries and illnesses for the calendar year 2012.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $280
- — Z (O) $400
More inspections at Baymont INN & Suites
View Baymont INN & Suites's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 721110)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338983067.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.