Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DIAMOND DESIGN CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DIAMOND DESIGN CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 1964 E. 18TH STREET, ERIE, PA 16510 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 338997216.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Diamond Design Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Diamond Design Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1964 E. 18TH STREET
City
ERIE
State
PA
ZIP
16510
Mailing
2503 PEACH ST., ERIE, PA 16502
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact or from falling objects were not protected by protective helmets:   a) jobsite, 1964 E. 18th Street in Erie, PA.  On or about April 8, 2013, employees working on the ground were not using hard hats to protect from objects falling from the scaffolding and other overhead work areas.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 H02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2): Employees working below a scaffold were not protected from falling tools, materials or equipment in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (h)(2)(i)-(v) of this section:  a) jobsite, 1964 E. 18th Street in Erie, PA.  On or about April 8, 2013, employees were not protected from falling objects including but not limited to hand tools, debris, and other small objects when working on the ground, below the ladder jack scaffold.  Falling object protection was not utilized on and/or around the ladder jack scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.403 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification:  a) jobsite, 1964 E. 18th Street in Erie, PA.  On or about April 8, 2013, the power strip, used to supply power to the saws and other power tools, was labeled for indoor use only.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided which will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  a) jobsite, 1964 E. 18th Street in Erie, PA.  On or about April 8, 2013, the strain relief on the DeWalt Skilz Saw was frayed, exposing the inner wires of the flexible cord.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.452 N01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.452(n)(1): Scaffold platforms were be placed higher than the second highest rung or step of the ladder supporting the platform:    a) jobsite, 1964 E. 18th Street in Erie, PA, front of building.  On or about April 8, 2013, the board used as a work platform on a step-ladder scaffold was positioned and laid across the top/highest rungs of the step-ladders.  Personnel were conducting construction work activities from the board/work platform.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were not used only for the purpose for which they were designed:  a) jobsite, 1964 E. 18th Street in Erie, PA, front of building.  On or about April 8, 2013, the 6-foot stepladder used to support the working platform of the stepladder scaffold was not used for the purposed for which it was designed in that, the stepladder was folded and leaned against the wall.  Personnel were working from the stepladder scaffold while the ladder was in the leaning/folded position.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:  a) jobsite, 1964 E. 18th Street in Erie, PA.  On or about April 8, 2013, employees working on the ladder jack scaffold, 12 feet above the lower level, were not protected from falling by personal fall protection or another means to protect the workers from falling.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    a) jobsite, 1964 E. 18th Street in Erie, PA, front of building.  On or about April 8, 2013, employees performing construction work activities while standing on the lower roof (roof for entranceway to building), 10 feet above the ground, were not protected from falling to the ground by any fall protection systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

View Diamond Design Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 338997216.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.