Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HFM FOOD SERVICE

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of HFM FOOD SERVICE in GUERRERO ST., HARMON INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD, TAMUNING, GU 96913 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 339015935.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch HFM Food Service — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for HFM Food Service is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HFM FOOD SERVICE
Site address
GUERRERO ST., HARMON INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD
City
TAMUNING
State
GU
ZIP
96913
Mailing
P.O. BOX 21089, BARRIGADA, GU 96921
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.157 E02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Jul 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:   This violation was discovered on April 16, 2013; where the fire extinguishers in the facility had not been inspected on a monthly basis.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.157 E03

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Jul 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): The date of the annual maintenance check of portable fire extinguishers was not recorded:   This violation was discovered on April 16, 2013; where the fire extinguishers in the facility had not received annual maintenance checks/inspections.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Jul 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The employer failed to provide an educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:     This violation was discovered on April 16, 2013 throughout the warehouse where the employees expected to use fire extinguishers were not trained in the general principles and operation of fire extinguishers and hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Jul 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance shall be conducted at least once every three years.  This violation was discovered on April 16, 2013; where the employer did not evaluate each powered industrial truck operator's ability to operate a forklift.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Jul 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):   This violation was discovered on April 16, 2013; where the employer did not maintain certification records of any formal forklift operator training or of any three year forklift operator performance evaluations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Jul 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:   This violation was discovered on April 16, 2013; where the circuit panel was not marked to indicate its purpose nor was it arranged so the purpose was evident.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Jul 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose:   This violation was discovered on April 16, 2013; where the cover was missing from the warehouse building circuit panel junction box.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 P01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Jul 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):    This violation was discovered on April 16, 2013; where a Hyster forklift had a defective back-up alarm and was not taken out of service.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View HFM Food Service's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339015935.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.