Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: M & M ROOFING LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of M & M ROOFING LLC in 215 TUDOR LANE, THE OAKS APARTMENTS, MANCHESTER, CT 06040 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339024770.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M & M Roofing LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M & M Roofing LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
M & M ROOFING LLC
Site address
215 TUDOR LANE, THE OAKS APARTMENTS
City
MANCHESTER
State
CT
ZIP
06040
Mailing
141 NICHOLS ROAD, WOLCOTT, CT 06716
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:    a)  The Oaks Apartments, 215 Tudor Lane, Manchester, CT. - On or about 4-25-13 - Employee loading material on the Laddervator was exposed to head injury by not wearing head protection while hoisting material to the roof 19 to 20 feet in height.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — C (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.404 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,760 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii): On a construction site, where an assured equipment grounding program was not utilized, all 120-volt, single-phase, 15 and 20 ampere receptacle outlets which were not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and which are in use by employees did not have approved ground fault circuit interrupers for personal protection.    a)  The Oaks Apartments, 215 Tudor Lane, Manchester, CT. - On or about 4-25-13 - Employees were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazard from extension cords used to power portable hand saws which did not have a GFCI (ground fault circuit interruper) in the system.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — C (S) $1760
  • — Z (S) $1760

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2013
Abate by
May 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to upper landing surfaces, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladders were used to gain access.    a)  The Oaks Apartments, 215 Tudor Lane, Manchester, CT. - On or about 4-25-13 - Employees were accessing the roof work area from an aluminum extension ladder that did not extend three feet above the eave of the roof exposing employee to a 16 to 17 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1000
  • — C (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2013
Abate by
May 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $15,400 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     a)  215 Tudor Lane, The Oaks Apartments Job Site - On or about 4-25-13 - Employees were exposed to 16 to 17 foot fall hazards while installing a new roof on the apartment building.    The M & M Roofing, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315555771, citation number 2, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on 8/28/11), with respect to a workplace located at 31 Todd Road, Wolcott, CT.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $7000
  • — C (R) $15400
  • — Z (R) $15400

View M & M Roofing LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339024770.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.