WOODSTOCK, IL —
OSHA Inspection: D. B. HESS COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of D. B. HESS COMPANY in 1530 MCCONNELL ROAD, WOODSTOCK, IL 60098 (NAICS 323117). OSHA activity number 339026999.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- D. B. HESS COMPANY
- Site address
- 1530 MCCONNELL ROAD
- City
- WOODSTOCK
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60098
- Mailing
- 1530 MCCONNELL ROAD, WOODSTOCK, IL 60098
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323117
- Employees
- 160
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.219 C02
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $4,250
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2): All exposed parts of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform, excepting runways used exclusively for oiling, or running adjustments, were not protected by a stationary casing enclosing shafting completely or by a trough enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting as location required: Web Press #2 Line, Baldwin Stobb Stacker. Stacker operators were exposed to an unguarded rotating horizontal shaft on the stacker when routinely pressing the cycle stop button during each bundling sequence. There is no documentation or certification required for this item.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): Web Press #2 Line, Baldwin Stobb Stacker. Stacker operators were exposed to unguarded inrunning nip points between belts and pulleys on the stacker when routinely pressing the cycle stop button during each bundling sequence. There is no documentation or certification required for this item.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.334 C01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $4,250
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(c)(1): Unqualified persons performed testing work on electric circuits or equipment. On or about April 19, 2013, maintenance employee(s) who performed voltage testing on energized components inside a 230v-480v machine panel were not qualified to peform testing work on electric circuits and equipment. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(c). Abatement note: Qualified persons shall be capable of working safely on energized circuits and shall be familiar with the proper use of special precautionary techniques, personal protective equipment (PPE), insulating & shielding materials and insulated tools (see 1910.333(c)(2)).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $4,250
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: On or about April 19, 2013, maintenance employee(s) who performed voltage testing on energized components inside a machine panel were not provided with and did not wear the electrical protective equipment listed below, to protect against electrical shock and arc flash/blast injuries: a) Rubber insulating gloves with leather protectors b) Arc-rated flash suit hood or balaclava c) Hearing protection (canal inserts) There is no abatement documentation or certification required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(c). Abatement Note: For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition, www.NFPA.org.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.335 A01 IV
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(iv): Employees exposed to the danger of head injury from electric shock or burns due to contact with exposed energized parts did not wear nonconductive head protection: On or about April 19, 2013, maintenance employee(s) performed voltage testing on 230v-480v energized components inside a machine panel. Nonconductive head protection was not worn. There is no abatement documentation or certification required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(c). Abatement Note: For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition, www.NFPA.org.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01 V
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(v): Employees exposed to the danger of injury to the eyes or face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying objects resulting from electrical explosion did not wear protective equipment for the eyes or face: On or about April 19, 2013, maintenance employee(s) performed voltage testing on 230v-480v energized components inside a machine panel. An arc-rated face shield was not worn to protect the eyes and face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying debris. There is no abatement documentation or certification required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 1903.19(c). Abatement Note: For compliance assistance, refer to NFPA 70E national consensus standard, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, 2012 Edition, www.NFPA.org.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.179 J02 III
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): Monthly inspections of hooks, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, were not performed: Web Press Dept., Zimmerman 500 lbs. Hoists for "Backsavers." The employer did not complete certification records of the monthly inspections of the hoist hooks for deformations or cracks. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.179 J02 IV
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed: Web Press Dept., Zimmerman 500 lbs. Hoists for "Backsavers." The employer did not complete certification records of the monthly inspections of the hoist chains/cables, including end connections, for excessive wear, twist, distorted links or stretch. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at D. B. Hess Company
View D. B. Hess Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323117)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339026999.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.