MIDDLETOWN, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: FLO-TECH, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FLO-TECH, LLC in 699 MIDDLE ST, MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457 (NAICS 325992). OSHA activity number 339028011.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FLO-TECH, LLC
- Site address
- 699 MIDDLE ST
- City
- MIDDLETOWN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06457
- Mailing
- 699 MIDDLE ST, MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325992
- Employees
- 80
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Toner Room: The employer did not conduct a Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine the necessitate and appropriate types of PPE for the employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2520
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment (PPE). Facility: The employees, required to wear PPE such as, (but not limited to), safety glasses, ear plugs, lab coats and gloves were not provided with appropriate information and training.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,890 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met. Facility: The employer did not establish and implement a site specific hazard communication program where employees were expected to use chemicals, including but not limited to, alcohol, propane, and toner.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1890
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area. Facility: The employees, required to use chemicals (including but not limited to), alcohol, propane, and toner were not provided with information and training in hazard communicaitons.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1904.32 A02
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $630 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(2): The employer did not create an annual summary of injuries and illnesses recorded on the OSHA 300 Log. Facility: The employer did not create the OSHA 300A log for the year 2012.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $630
- · Z (O) $900
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service, and shall not be placed in service if the examination shows any condition adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle. Such examination shall be made at least daily: Facility: The employer did not ensure daily inspections occurred when the employees were operating fork lifts on a daily basis.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325992)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339028011.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.