Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MATERIAL HANDLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MATERIAL HANDLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in 7488 ROUND POUND ROAD, NORTH SYRACUSE, NY 13212 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 339028961.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Material Handling Technologies, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Material Handling Technologies, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7488 ROUND POUND ROAD
City
NORTH SYRACUSE
State
NY
ZIP
13212
Mailing
7488 ROUND POUND ROAD, NORTH SYRACUSE, NY 13212
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet was not kept free from storage on all sides of paint booth(s):  a) Spray Paint Booth, on or about 5/8/13: Combustible materials including but not limited to: cardboard; wood pallets; and wood pieces were observed on the right  side and back of  the paint booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.107 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): Spraying area(s) were not kept free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues and tool(s) used for cleaning purposes in spraying area(s) were not of non-sparking material:      a) Spray Paint Booth, on or about 5/8/13: There was an accumulation of combustible residues on the saw horses used as work supports.  Employee spray paints with Class 1B Flammable materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) Employer did not establish nor implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures when respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer:     a)  Spray Paint Booth, on or about 5/8/13: Employer had not established a written respirator protection program when employee was required to wear a half face air purifying respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) Employees required to wear negative pressure respirators were not provided with a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator:      a)  Spray Paint Booth, on or about 6/21/13: Employee required to wear a half face air purifying respirator had not been provided with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight fitting face piece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator face piece (size, style, model or make) was used, and at least annually thereafter:      a) Spray Paint Booth, on or about 5/8/13: Employee is required to wear a half face air purifying respirator and had not been fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k) The employer did not provide effective, comprehensive, understandable, and annual (or more often if necessary) training to employees who are required to use respirators:     a)  Spray Paint Booth, on or about 5/8/13: Employee is required to wear a half face air purifying respirator and had not received respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Abate by
Jul 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:      a)  Throughout the facility, on or about 5/8/13: Training was not provided to employees on the use of fire extinguishers and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting.         * ABATEMENT NOTE: By this date the employer must either correct the alleged violation or implement a Fire Safety Policy; as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and .39 which includes the evacuation requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(b).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

View Material Handling Technologies, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339028961.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.