TAMUNING, GU —
OSHA Inspection: HILTON GUAM RESORT & SPA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HILTON GUAM RESORT & SPA in 202 HILTON ROAD TUMON BAY, GU 96913, TAMUNING, GU 96913 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 339029357.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HILTON GUAM RESORT & SPA
- Site address
- 202 HILTON ROAD TUMON BAY, GU 96913
- City
- TAMUNING
- State
- GU
- ZIP
- 96913
- Mailing
- 202 HILTON ROAD TUMON BAY, GU 96913, TAMUNING, GU 96913
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 721110
- Employees
- 600
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,913 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: a) Maintenance/Carpentry Shop - Noted on or about 4/24/13 and at times prior thereto, a doubled wheeled Dayton bench grinder had a gap of 1.5" on the right side between the work rest and grinding wheel, and 1" on the left side between the work rest and the grinding wheel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1912.5
- — Z (S) $2550
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: a) Maintenance/Carpentry Shop - Noted on or about 4/24/13 and at times prior thereto, a Dayton bench grinder had two tongue guards that were not adjusted to within 1/4" of the grinding wheel; the gap on both the left and right hand wheels was 3/4".
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,913 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet: a) Maintenance/Engineering - Noted on or about 4/24/13 and at times prior thereto, a cylinder each of oxygen and acetylene were stored together when not in use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1912.5
- — Z (S) $2550
1910.303 G01
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,913 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment: a. Maintenance/Engineering - Noted on or about 4/24/13 and at times prior thereto, electrical panel box LP-UBB was blocked with boxes and pails and did not permit a minimum 3-foot clearance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1912.5
- — Z (S) $2550
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): a) Maintenance/Engineering - Noted on or about 4/24/13 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not prepare a workplace hazard assessment for employees using chemicals, hand tools, and machinery that require the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The employer has provided PPE such as safety glasses, ear plugs, and hardhats. A hazard assessment has not been conducted to include the following: 1. Select and have each affected employee use the types of PPE that will protect them from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment; 2. Communicate the selection decisions to each affected employee and; 3. Select PPE that properly fits each affected employee. *ABATEMENT NOTE: The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Hilton Guam Resort & SPA
View Hilton Guam Resort & SPA's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 721110)
More inspections in GU
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339029357.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.