Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY-YUMA PROVING GROUND

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY-YUMA PROVING GROUND in YUMA PROVING GROUNDS BLDG 536, YUMA, AZ 85369 (NAICS 445120). OSHA activity number 339037475.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Defense Commissary Agency-Yuma Proving Ground for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Defense Commissary Agency-Yuma Proving Ground is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
YUMA PROVING GROUNDS BLDG 536
City
YUMA
State
AZ
ZIP
85369
Mailing
YUMA PROVING GROUND BLDG 536, YUMA, AZ 85365
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
445120
Employees
10
Ownership type
Federal government (D)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 B05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet):  (a) Commissary, Bldg 536, Yuma Proving Ground, AZ 85365:  On or about 3 May 2013, and at times prior thereto, a door in the Admin Section which could be mistaken for an exit was not marked with a sign or other designation identifying it as leading to the Warehouse, exposing employees and others to hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.157 E03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): The date of the annual maintenance check of portable fire extinguishers was not recorded:  (a) Commissary, Bldg 536, Yuma Proving Ground, AZ 85365: On or about 3 May 2013, and at times prior thereto, the portable fire extinguishers mounted throughout the establishment did not have tags indicating the date that the annual maintenance check was conducted and recorded, exposing the employees to hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:  (a) Commissary, Bldg 536, Yuma Proving Ground, AZ 85365:  On or about 3 May 2013, and at times prior thereto, the legends inside electrical panels E-2 and E-1 contained errors in marking as to indications of circuit locations and purposes, exposing employees to hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1904.32 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(2): The employer did not create an annual summary of injuries and illnesses recorded on the OSHA log:  (a) DeCA Commissary, Bldg 536, Yuma Proving Ground, AZ 85365: On or about 3 May 2013, when requested to provide a copy of the OSHA Form 300A Annual Summary of Injuries and Illnesses for Calendar Year 2012, the employer could not produce a copy or provide an original certified form for review.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  (a) Commissary, Bldg 536, Yuma Proving Ground, AZ 85365:  On or about 3 May 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not document that a hazard assessment of the workplace which required personal protective equipment had been conducted, the date of the evaluation, the person certifying the evaluation, and tht the document was identified as the "certification" of the hazard assessment.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

View Defense Commissary Agency-Yuma Proving Ground's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339037475.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.