Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INTEGRAL PRODUCTS LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of INTEGRAL PRODUCTS LLC in 8055 AE SPUR, SULLIVAN, MO 63080 (NAICS 423990). OSHA activity number 339048159.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Integral Products LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Integral Products LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8055 AE SPUR
City
SULLIVAN
State
MO
ZIP
63080
Mailing
8055 AE SPUR, SULLIVAN, MO 63080
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423990
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $480 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):     A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    On or about 05/02/2013, the employer had not developed a written respiratory protection program for employees who are required to wear a  3M 5000 half-mask respirator and a 3M 6900 Full Face respirator, while engaged in blending, mixing,  and transferring operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $480
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 E02 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(2)(i):   The employer did not identify a physician or other licensed health care professional (PLHCP) to perform medical evaluations using a medical questionnaire or an initial medical examination that obtained the same information as the medical questionnaire:   On or about 05/02/2013, employee(s) engaged in blending, mixing, and transferring operations were not provided a medical evaluation prior to being required to wear a 3M 5000 half-mask and 3M 6900 full face respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) was used and at least annually thereafter:  On or about 05/02/2013 employee(s) engaged in blending, mixing, and transferring operations, were not fit tested.  Employees  are required to wear 3M 5000 half-mask respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Abate by
Jul 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:   On or about 05/02/2013, an employee using the Stokes R machine to press out tablets for approximately six hours, was wearing a 3M 5000 half-mask respirator.  The employee had a beard;  however, he had not been fit tested nor had he received a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Abate by
Jul 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):     Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    On or about 05/02/2013, employee operating the, Stokes FJS No. R, reached his left middle finger into the POO(Point of Operation), resulting in a finger tip amputation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $360 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g),  and (h) will be met:    On or about 05/02/2013, a written Hazard Communication Program had not been developed for employees engaged in blending, mixing, and transferring operations.  Employer uses such products as, but not limited to, Monochlor, Sodium Carbonate Peroxyhydrate PG III, and Magnesim Sulfate Anhydrous.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $360
  • — Z (S) $1200

View Integral Products LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339048159.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.