Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: CUSTOMIZED DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CUSTOMIZED DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC. in 1 GATEWAY COMMERCE DRIVE, EDWARDSVILLE, IL 62025 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 339053720.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Customized Distribution Services, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Customized Distribution Services, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1 GATEWAY COMMERCE DRIVE
City
EDWARDSVILLE
State
IL
ZIP
62025
Mailing
1 GATEWAY COMMERCE DRIVE, EDWARDSVILLE, IL 62025
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
145
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2013
Abate by
Aug 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:     Employees performing forklift maintenance were exposed to electrical shock and caught-between hazards and the employer failed to utilize procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3840
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.147 C05 II C 2

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2013
Abate by
Aug 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)[C][2]:  Means of attachment of tagout devices utilized by the employer were not of a non-reusable type, attachable by hand, self-locking, and non-releasable with a minimum unlocking strength of no less than 50 pounds:    Employees performing forklift maintenance were exposed to electrical shock and caught-between hazards in relation to untagged operator controls and the employer failed to use tagout devices that were non-reusable, attached by hand, self-locking, and non-releasable with a minimum unlocking strength of no less than 50 pounds.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4880
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.147 D04 III

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2013
Abate by
Aug 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(iii): Tagout devices utilized were not affixed in such a manner as to clearly indicate that the operation or movement of the energy isolating devices from the safe or off position was prohibited:  Employees performing forklift maintenance were exposed to electrical shock and caught-between hazards in relation to untagged operator controls and the employer failed to affix tagout devices in such a manner as to clearly indicate that the operation or movement of the energy isolation device from the safe or off position was prohibited.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i):  The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:     Employees performing forklift maintenance were exposed to electrical shock and caught-between hazards and the employer failed to conduct periodic inspection of the energy control procedures at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $5500

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)[A]: Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:    Employees performing forklift maintenance were exposed to electrical shock and caught-between hazards and the employer failed to train authorized employees in the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $5500

1910.147 D03

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2013
Abate by
Aug 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3):  All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source:    Employees performing forklift maintenance were exposed to electrical shock and caught-between hazards in relation to battery energy and unchocked drive tires and the employer failed to physically locate and operate energy isolating devices in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy sources.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4880
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.147 D04 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2013
Abate by
Aug 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(ii): Lockout devices utilized were not affixed in a manner that held the energy isolating device in a safe or off position:   Employees performing forklift maintenance were exposed to electrical shock and caught-between hazards in relation to battery energy and unchocked drive tires and the employer failed to ensure lockout devices were affixed in a manner that held the energy isolating device in a safe or off position.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Customized Distribution Services, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339053720.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.