Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AA&L ROOFING, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of AA&L ROOFING, INC. in 7115 MIRAMAR, PEORIA, IL 61614 (NAICS 423330). OSHA activity number 339065708.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch AA&L Roofing, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for AA&L Roofing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AA&L ROOFING, INC.
Site address
7115 MIRAMAR
City
PEORIA
State
IL
ZIP
61614
Mailing
PO BOX 101, CHILLICOTHE, IL 61523
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423330
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.100(a):   Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:   An employee was unprotected from the hazard of being struck in the head by falling materials, due to the fact that hard hats were not being worn.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.    An employee accessed the ladder jack scaffold by climbing around the ladder jack bracket and scaffold platform, exposing the employee to the hazard of falling approximately 22.4 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Abate by
Jul 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7):   Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled or altered under the supervision of a competent person:   An employee was working off of a ladder jack scaffold that had not been erected under the supervision of a competent person, exposing the employee to the hazard of falling approximately 22.4 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Abate by
Jul 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:   An employee was unprotected from fall hazards while working on a ladder jack scaffold at a height of approximately 22.4 feet above the ground below, because the employer had not provided training to the employee on the hazards associated with working on the scaffold and the procedures to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Abate by
Jul 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question:   An employee was unprotected from fall hazards while working on a ladder jack scaffold at a height of approximately 22.4 feet above the ground below, because the employer had not provided training to the employee on the nature of scaffold hazards, correct procedures for erecting the scaffold, the design criteria, maximum intended load-carrying capacity, and the intended use of the scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i):   Each employee on a ladder jack scaffold more than ten feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level by a personal fall arrest system:   a.  An employee was unprotected from fall hazards while working off of a ladder jack scaffold at a height of approximately 22.4 feet above the ground below, due to the fact that no personal fall arrest system was in place.   b.  Employees were unprotected from fall hazards while working off of tubular welded scaffold located on a scissor truck at a height of approximately 17.0 feet above the ground below, due to the fact that no personal fall arrest system was in place.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.452 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Ladder jack scaffold platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m):   An employee was exposed to a fall hazard while working off of a ladder jack scaffold with a platform height of approximately 22.4 feet above the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.452 K02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(2): All ladders used to support ladder jack scaffolds did not meet the requirements of Subpart X - Stairways and Ladders:   An employee was working on a ladder jack scaffold utilizing two extension ladders that were not erected at the proper angle.  The horizontal distance from the top supports to the feet of the ladders were greater than one-quarter of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):   An employee was working off of a ladder jack scaffold utilizing two extension ladders that were not erected at proper angle.  The horizontal distance from the top supports to the feet of the ladders were greater than one-quarter of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):   Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:   An employee was exposed to fall hazards because the fiberglass extension ladder did not extend three feet above the roof.  The employee was working approximately 25 feet above the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1060 A01 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 18, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(iii):     The employer did not ensure that each employee using ladders and stairways had been trained by a competent person in the proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling of all stairways and ladders:   An employee was exposed to fall hazards because the extension ladder did not extend three feet above the roof and the employer had not ensured that each employee had been trained by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View AA&L Roofing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339065708.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.