DENVILLE, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: ANTHONY & SONS BAKERY, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ANTHONY & SONS BAKERY, INC. in 20 LUGER ROAD, DENVILLE, NJ 07834 (NAICS 311812). OSHA activity number 339077281.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANTHONY & SONS BAKERY, INC.
- Site address
- 20 LUGER ROAD
- City
- DENVILLE
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07834
- Mailing
- 20 LUGER ROAD, DENVILLE, NJ 07834
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311812
- Employees
- 188
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.27 C04
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,940 · Current $4,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.27(c)(4): The employer did not install fixed ladders with at least 7 inches of clearence from the centerline of the rung to the nearest permanent object in the back of the ladder. a) Establishment - 2 Crossover Bridges with 1 adjacent to the Gemini conveyor system and one adjacet to the Rack Loader: Employees were exposed to falls as each Crossover Bridge had only 2 inches of clearance from the centerline of the top rung to a retrofitted metal shield behind the rung. Violation observed on or about 5/20/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4500
- — Z (S) $5940
1910.147 C04 II B
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $4,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy. a) Establishment - Production Floor: The employer's energy control procedure did not provide sufficient detail and specificity for employees to safely and effectively control energy sources during the servicing or maintenance of equipment, such as the Gemini System Rack Loader machinery. Violation disclosed on or about 5/20/13.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4500
- — Z (S) $6930
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,960 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: a) Establishment: The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedures. Violation occurred on or about 05/20/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $3960
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,960 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees: a) Establishment: Employee(s) required to perform maintenance, service and repair to equipment, such as but not limited to the Gemini Systems Rack Loader, were not provided training on machine specific energy control procedures. Violation disclosed on or about 5/20/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $3960
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,960 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a) Establishment: Employees were not trained prior to being permitted to operate a powered industrial vehicle. Violation observed on or about 5/20/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3960
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by moving parts and nip points: a) Establishment - Bakery Dept. - Gemini Loader: The Banner Machine Guard Safety Switch was not engaged and did not shut power to the machinery when the cage was opened. Violation occurred on or about 5/16/2013. b) Establishment - Bakery Dept. - Winkler System: The Winkler System panning table was not guarded to prevent employees hands from coming in contact with pinch points. Violaton observed on or about 5/20/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $6930
1910.305 B01 I
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,950 · Current $1,102 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i): Openings through which conductors entered cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: a) Establishment - Production Floor. - Gemini System Conveyor: Conductors entering a 480 volt cabinet were not enclosed exposing employees to electric shock. Violation observed on or about 5/20/2013. b) Establishment - Production Floor. - Gemini System Conveyor: Conductors entering a 480 volt cabinet were not enclosed exposing employees to electric shock. Violation observed on or about 5/20/2013.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1102
- — Z (S) $4950
More inspections at Anthony & Sons Bakery, INC.
View Anthony & Sons Bakery, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311812)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339077281.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.