Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DELEK REFINING, LTD

Follow-up inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a follow-up safety inspection of DELEK REFINING, LTD in 1702 E. COMMERCE ST., TYLER, TX 75710 (NAICS 324110). OSHA activity number 339081614.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Delek Refining, LTD — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Delek Refining, LTD is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DELEK REFINING, LTD
Site address
1702 E. COMMERCE ST.
City
TYLER
State
TX
ZIP
75710
Mailing
425 MCMURREY DRIVE, TYLER, TX 75702
Inspection type
Follow-up (F)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
324110
Employees
289
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 E05

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not assure that Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) recommendations were resolved in a timely manner:    The employer does not to ensure that 2009 PHA recommendations are resolved in a timely manner.    This violation occurred on or about May 23, 2013 and at times prior thereto in the Naphtha Hydrotreater (unit 30) where employees were exposed to inhalation, fire, and explosion hazards from potential releases of hazardous materials without ensuring 2009 PHA recommendations were resolved in a timely manner such as  but not limited to.    a.     2009 PHA recommendation, R2009017-001 (Bates #01745)    b.     2009 PHA recommendation, R2009032-001 (Bates #01749)    c.     2009 PHA recommendation, R2009038-001 (Bates #1751)
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $5500
  • — F (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5500

1910.119 F01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information:  The employer does not ensure that written operating procedures are developed and implemented to provide clear instructions for changing temperature alarm setpoints for high temperature separator (HTS), 30-V-1.    This violation occurred on or about August 5, 2013, and at times prior thereto, in the Naphtha Hydrotreater (unit 30); where employees were exposed to inhalation, fire, and explosion hazards from potential releases of hazardous materials without developed and implemented written operating procedures to provide clear instructions for changing temperature alarm setpoints for following instances.    a. High high and process high alarm temperature setpoints were changed from 500F to 440F and from 500F to 430F respectively.  These temperature alarm setpoints are associated with a temperature indicator (30-TI021) which indicates temperature of the stream from a heat exchanger (30-E-1C) to HTS (30-V-1).   b. High high and process high alarm temperature setpoints were changed from 600F to 440F and from 500F to 430F respectively.  These temperature alarm setpoints are associated with a temperature indicator (30-TI035) which indicates temperature of the stream from a heat exchanger (30-E-1A) to HTS (30-V-1).
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — F (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 F01 II

Serious Gravity 10 35 instances 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): Operating procedures did not contain written operating limits:        The employer does not ensure that the operating procedures for the Naphtha Hydrotreater Unit, #30.6.1, Consequences of Deviation, contain the alarm values.  The alarm values were not present for the following equipment:      gg. Deviation of a make up compressor 30-C-2A/B 2nd  stage discharge pressure high, which is associated with high high temperature switches (30-TSHH-3033/3037), written operating limits for high alarm, normal value and low alarm are not listed (Bates #00346).
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 F01 II A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii)(A): Written operating procedures did not contain consequences of deviations:      The employer does not ensure that operating procedures contain consequences of deviations.      This violation occurred on or about May 23, 2013 and at times prior thereto in the Saturated Gas (Sat-Gas) unit where employees were exposed to inhalation, fire, and explosion hazards from potential releases of hazardous materials without ensure operating procedures contain consequences of deviations.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — F (O) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.119 F01 II B

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii)(B): Written operating procedures did not contain steps required to correct or avoid deviations:    The employer does not ensure that operating procedures contain steps required to correct or avoid deviations.     This violation occurred on or about May 23, 2013 and at times prior thereto in the Saturated Gas (Sat-Gas) unit where employees were exposed to inhalation, fire, and explosion hazards from potential releases of hazardous materials without ensure operating procedures contain steps required to correct or avoid deviations.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $0
  • — F (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 D03 I B

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $38,500 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): The employer's piping and instrument diagrams were not accurate and did not include process safety information that provided specific identification of equipment that is part of the process:      The employer does not ensure that piping and instrument diagrams (P&IDs) were accurate and include process safety information pertaining to equipment.       This violation occurred on or about May 23, 2013 and at times prior thereto in the Naphtha Hydrotreater (unit 30), Saturated Gas (unit 60), and Storage and Blending(unit 01) units where employees were exposed to inhalation, fire, and explosion hazards from potential releases of hazardous materials without ensure P&IDs were accurate and included process safety information (PSI) for the following instances.    c. P&ID (DK-60-0-0002L, Rev. 16), Sponge Oil Absorber, by pass line for a lean oil air cooler (60-E-30) from the control valve (FV-002) to a lean oil water cooler (60-E-5)  does not exist in the field.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (R) $38500
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — Z (R) $38500

1910.119 F03

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $70,000 · Current $35,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(3): The operating procedures were not reviewed as often as necessary to assure that they reflect current operating practice, including changes that result from changes in process chemicals, technology, and equipment, and changes to facilities. The employer did not annually certify that operating procedures were current and accurate:      The employer does not ensure that operating procedures are current and accurate.      This violation occurred on or about May 23, 2013 and at times prior thereto in the Naphtha Hydrotreater (NHT) and Saturated Gas (Sat-Gas) where employees were exposed to inhalation, fire, and explosion hazards from potential releases of hazardous materials without ensure operating procedures were current and accurate for the following instances.       a. In the Naphtha Hydrotreater/Saturated Gas/ Unit Operating Limit List of Equipment, Procedure number 30.8.1    Bates: #00376:         . The "Sat Gas Vessel List" is incorrect. It should  be listed as Naphtha Hydrotreater Vessel List.         . The high temperature separator is listed as 30-V-2 that is incorrect. It should be listed as 30-V-1.         . Temperature is controlled with TIC-3002& is incorrect. It should be listed as temperature is controlled with TC-021.         . The low temperature separator is listed as 30-V-3 that is incorrect. It should be listed as 30-V-2.       Bates #00378: The "Naphtha Hydrotreater Vessel List" is incorrect. It should be listed as Saturated Gas Vessel List.       Bates #00379:  In the Debutanizer, 60-V-3A, it states "Bottom product from the Debutanizer is charge to the Splitter Tower (60-V-6)". This is incorrect. The Splitter Tower (60-V-6) was out of service.      Bates #00380: Splitter Tower (60-V-6) and its process safety information (PSI) are listed in the Sat-Gas Vessel list. This tower should be removed because it was out of the service. The new splitter (60-20-V) and its PSI should be added into this procedure.       b. In the "Emergency Procedure /Loss of Utilities", Procedure Number 30.2.7, Bates #00120.  In Step #5, it states"The 300-psig steam to the Splitter reboiler, 60-E-18, will stop". This is incorrect because the reboiler, 60-E-18, was out of service.      c. In the "Normal Start-Up Procedure/Naphtha Hydrotreater/Establishing Naphtha Circulation", Procedure Number 30.3.4, Bates #00155, in the step #7, it states"If Naphtha from the Crude Unit is not available, the Contact Accumulator (60-V-11) and the Stripper (60-V-10) can be established by lining Naphtha to the Splitter Bottoms Pumps (60-P-8A/B)."This is incorrect because Splitter Bottom Pumps (60-P-8A/B) were out of service.      d. The "Special Procedures/Naphtha Hydrotreater Chloride Scrubber (30-V-8) Adsorbent Change out Shutdown Procedure", Procedure Number 30.5.10, Bates #00211-#00217 was listed in the operating procedures. This procedure should be removed because the Booster Gas Chloride Scrubber (30-V-8) was out of service.      e. In the "Start-Up Procedures/Naphtha Hydrotreater /Isolation-Purging-Evacuation in Preparation for Start-Up", Procedure Number 30.3.1, Bates #00165, in step #18, it states "Line up chloride scrubber (30-V-8) for service". This step should be removed because the Booster Gas Chloride Scrubber (30-V-8) was out of service.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (R) $70000
  • — F (S) $35000
  • — Z (R) $70000

1910.119 L05

Deleted Repeat Gravity 10 2 instances 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $38,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(5): If a change covered by 29 CFR 1910.119(l) resulted in a change in the operating procedures or practices required by 29 CFR 1910.119(f), such procedures or practices were not updated accordingly:    The employer does not update written procedures or practices to manage changes to high high (HH) alarm temperature setpoints and process high (PH) alarm temperature setpoints for a high temperature separator (HTS), 30-V-1.    This violation occurred on or about August 5, 2013 and at times prior thereto in the Naphtha Hydrotreater (unit 30) where employees were exposed to inhalation, fire, and explosion hazards from potential releases of hazardous materials without establishing and implementing written procedures to manage changes to HH alarm temperature setpoints and PH alarm temperature setpoints for the HTS (30-V-1) for the following instances.      a. High high and process high alarm temperature setpoints were changed from 500F to 440F and from 500F to 430F respectively.  These temperature alarm setpoints are associated with a temperature indicator (30-TI021) which indicates temperature of the stream from a heat exchanger (30-E-1C) to HTS (30-V-1) and is located in a Process & Instrument Diagram (P&ID), DK-30-0-0001H, Rev.7.    b. High high and process high alarm temperature setpoints were change from 600F to 440F and from 500F to 430F respectively.  These temperature alarm setpoints are associated with a temperature indicator (30-TI035) which indicates temperature of the stream from a heat exchanger (30-E-1A) to HTS (30-V-1) and is located in a P&ID (DK-30-0-0001G, Rev 8).        DELEK REFINING, LTD WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD OR ITS EQUIVALENT STANDARD 29 CFR 1910.119(l)(5) WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 312119340, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 14 AND WAS AFFIRMED AS FINAL ORDER ON AUGUST 8, 2012 WITH REPSECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 1702 E. COMMERCE STREET, TYLER, TX 75710.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (R) $38500
  • — F (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $38500

View Delek Refining, LTD's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339081614.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.