Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: KISKA CONSTRUCTION INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of KISKA CONSTRUCTION INC. in 532 GRAND AVENUE KISKA CONSTRUCTION UNDER BRIDGE, NEWBURGH, NY 12550 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 339089492.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Kiska Construction INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kiska Construction INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
532 GRAND AVENUE KISKA CONSTRUCTION UNDER BRIDGE
City
NEWBURGH
State
NY
ZIP
12550
Mailing
10-34 44TH DRIVE, LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237310
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2013
Abate by
Nov 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.    a)  On or about 5/21/13,  north span of Newburgh-Beacon bridge:  Inspections of the jobsite did not include inspection of materials and equipment, such as:  temporary scaffold support ropes and fall protection rescue equipment.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2013
Abate by
Nov 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    a)  On or about 5/21/13, north span Newburgh Beacon bridge:  employees were not instructed in the recognition and avoidance of hazards associated with the use of ropes for temporary support of longitudinal cables during erection of scaffolding, as well as working on scaffold deck section(s) supported by temporary ropes during erection.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2013
Abate by
Nov 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:    a)  On or about 6/21/13 on the north span of the Newburgh Beacon Bridge:  Scaffold components (ropes, including temporary support ropes) were not inspected before each work shift by a competent person.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2013
Abate by
Nov 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b)(2): The training was not provided by a competent person for the correct procedures for erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, inspecting, and maintaining the type of scaffold in question;  a)  On or about 05/21/13, Newburgh Beacon Bridge jobsite:  Employees were not provided with training in correct procedures for erecting the scaffold system, in that:  employees were not trainied in the selection of materials suitable for use as temporary support ropes, as well as use and limitations of temporary support ropes during erection of the scaffold deck.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 A03

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2013
Abate by
Nov 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(3): Each suspension rope, including connecting hardware, used on non-adjustable suspension scaffolds shall be capable of supporting, without failure, at least 6 times the maximum intended load applied or transmitted to that rope.  a)  On or about 5/21/13, north span of Newburgh Beacon Bridge:  Suspension ropes, including temporary support ropes, used in the construction of the scaffold platform were not capable of supporting at least 6 times the maximum intended load applied or transmitted to the rope.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

1926.451 A06

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2013
Abate by
Nov 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds shall be designed by a qualified person and shall be constructed and loaded in accordance with that design. Non-mandatory Appendix A to this subpart contains examples of criteria that will enable an employer to comply with paragraph (a) of this section.  a)  On or about 5 /21/13, north span of the Newburgh-Beacon bridge:  Scaffolding was not designed by a qualified person and constructed and loaded in accordance with that design, in that:  Poly-dacron ropes were used for the temporary support of support cables and/or scaffold deck panels.  Poly-dacron ropes were used at location(s) where rope could be susceptible to abrasion from contact with bridge structural members, as well as susceptible to excessive tension due to issues with moving horizontal steel cables into place.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

1926.502 D16 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2013
Abate by
Nov 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:  a)   On or about May 21, 2013, north span of Newburg-Beacon Bridge:  Retractable lifeline systems used by employees while working at/near panel 69 were not properly rigged to limit freefalls to 6 feet; lifelines allowed excessive free fall distance of nearly 30 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

1926.502 D20

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2013
Abate by
Nov 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(20): The employer did not provide for prompt rescue of employees in the event of a fall or did not assure that employees were able to rescue themselves:    a)  On or about May 21, 2013, north span of Newburg Beacon Bridge:  a truck crane specified for use in the employer's fall protection rescue plan was not operational and the employer did not make other provisions to provide for the prompt rescue of employees in the event of a fall.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Kiska Construction INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339089492.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.