WEST BEND, WI —
OSHA Inspection: FASTRAC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FASTRAC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION in 1605 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE, WEST BEND, WI 53095 (NAICS 333514). OSHA activity number 339093494.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FASTRAC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
- Site address
- 1605 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE
- City
- WEST BEND
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53095
- Mailing
- 1605 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE, WEST BEND, WI 53095
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333514
- Employees
- 16
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: (a) The employer did not certify a hazard assessment was conducted to determine if personal protection equipment was required to be worn by employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: (a) A Hazardous Energy Control Program was not implemented to ensure that employees who perform maintenance or servicing activities are not exposed to unexpected energizing, start-up, or release of stored energy.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: (a) Energy control procedures were not developed, documented, and utilized during the set-up, maintenance, and servicing of equipment such as but not limited to: Haas CNC SL 30 lathe, Miyano JNC-45 CNC lathe, Hitachi HT HITEC Turn 23J, Hardinge lathe, Bar Feeder 1HT Hitec-Turn 20SII, Haas ST 20, Miyano KNC-45 CNC lathe, Haas SL 20 CNC lathe, and Haas SL 10 CNC lathe.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The training program of the employer did not include all the training elements listed under Items A-C of 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): (a) The employer did not provide training to employees assigned to set-up, perform maintenance, or servicing on equipment such as but not limited to: Haas CNC SL 30 lathe, Miyano JNC-45 CNC lathe, Hitachi HT HITEC Turn 23J, Hardinge lathe, Bar Feeder 1HT Hitec-Turn 20SII, Haas ST 20, Miyano KNC-45 CNC lathe, Haas SL 20 CNC lathe, and Haas SL 10 CNC lathe.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) The Miyano CNC Lathe (Model: JNC-45, S/N: JN450477) exposed employees to moving parts during the activities such as but not limited to the loading/unloading and startup/warm up from inadequate guarding on the door. (b) The Miyano CNC Lathe (Model: KNC-45, S/N: KNC-450389) exposed employees to moving parts during the activities such as but not limited to the loading/unloading and startup/warm up from the interlock switch on the door being by-passed. (c) The Haas SL 10 CNC Lathe Tool Presetter allowed the Door Override program to be turned on/off by the operators potentially exposing employees to moving parts during the activities such as but not limited to the loading/unloading and startup/warm up. (d) The Haas SL 20 CNC Lathe allowed the Door Override program to be turned on/off by the operators potentially exposing employees to moving parts during the activities such as but not limited to the loading/unloading and startup/warm up. (e) The Haas ST 20 CNC Lathe allowed the Door Override program to be turned on/off by the operators potentially exposing employees to moving parts during the activities such as but not limited to the loading/unloading and startup/warm up. (f) The Haas SL 30 CNC Lathe allowed the Door Override program to be turned on/off by the operators potentially exposing employees to moving parts during the activities such as but not limited to the loading/unloading and startup/warm up. (g) The Hardinge Lathe (Motor Type: DC SHUNT, S/N: B14135) had the rotating work-holding (chuck) device which was not guarded exposing employees to moving parts. (h) The Hardinge Lathe had the rotating work-holding (chuck) device which was not guarded exposing employees to moving parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein: (a) A Minute Maid container filled with Lathe Oil was not properly labeled with the appropriate hazard warnings.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Fastrac International Corporation
View Fastrac International Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333514)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339093494.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.